> At 09:59 PM 2/23/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote: > >Why not just "xlink"? The initial "x" suggests: > > ... not to mention "Extensible". Yes! The collective thought > process gives birth to another winner. Sign me up for xlink. -T. As Jon points out, it needs to begin with "XML-", being reserved. Sorry -- newbie mistake. However, for the pure sizzle, I'd think of changing the convention .... "xml-" anything doesn't exactly come trippingly off the tongue. Anyhow, if in newbie fashion I'm reopoening a can of worms,feel free to admonish me...Received on Monday, 24 February 1997 11:07:22 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:05 EDT