- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 10:54:05 -0500
- To: lee@sq.com
- CC: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
lee@sq.com wrote: > > > Your proposal sounds okay to me, except for one thing: > > > > 1] if there is a processing instruction tht occurs before the DOCTYPE > > line of the form <?-XML-CATALOG "system-id"?> then that is the system > > identifier of the catalog and all other mechanisms are disregarded. > > > > Why can't this be a relative URL? > > It can if you like. I didn't say it couldn't (I hope). No, but you went into detail elsewhere about how to resolve a relative URL, as if only if the direct pointer failed would you want to look for a relative URL. You even mention the RFC number (elsewhere). Paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 10:49:20 UTC