W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal?

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 15:34:20 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970203153145.00a73a7c@pop.intergate.bc.ca>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org 
At 11:09 AM 31/01/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>1.4.g Should we define/discuss traversal?

I'm beginning to think we should leave this out.  In the spec, we wrote
"traverse" means "use".  If we believe this, why don't we just say "use"?
Unless we are going to be forced to specify some behaviors; in which 
case a specific term like traversal is probably called for. - Tim
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 18:35:48 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:01 EDT