W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 15:34:19 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970203153015.00a74590@pop.intergate.bc.ca>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org

At 11:09 AM 31/01/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>1.4.f Should we define terms for links that are colocated with their
> ends, and if so, should we use in-line and out-of-line?

Yes and yes; it's a key intellectual underpinning, and whereas there is
a case for clink and ilink, they are less mnemonic. - Tim

Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 18:35:43 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Bray: "Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal?"
Previous message: Tim Bray: "Re: 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality"
Maybe in reply to: David G. Durand: "Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends"
Next in thread: James Clark: "Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:01 EDT