W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 20:40:24 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970223202642.00ad2c98@pop.intergate.bc.ca>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org

At 09:59 PM 2/23/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote:
>Why not just "xlink"? The initial "x" suggests:

... not to mention "Extensible".  Yes!  The collective thought
process gives birth to another winner.  Sign me up for xlink. -T.

Received on Sunday, 23 February 1997 23:41:36 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Bray: "Suggested new XML slogan"
Previous message: Jon Bosak: "Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link"
Maybe in reply to: Sam Hunting: "xlink, not multilink or xml-link"
Next in thread: Sam Hunting: "Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link"
Reply: Sam Hunting: "Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:05 EDT