W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 16:51:43 -0800
Message-Id: <199702080051.QAA04246@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM

[Liora Alschuler:]

| Is there a reason why we can't just call these "direct" and "indirect"
| links?

I agree with Liora.  These work very well intuitively and are about as
apropos as anything else that's been suggested.

Jon

Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 19:51:43 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: lee@sq.com: "Re: XML catalog draft"
Previous message: Jon Bosak: "Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?"
In reply to: Liora Alschuler: "Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends"
Next in thread: len bullard: "Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends"
Reply: len bullard: "Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:02 EDT