> I take it that nobody else considers it important to advertise the fact > that this technology is *not* limited to XML applications? - Tim Is this something like the HyTime claim that it is not limited to SGML? It is rather more plausible, I think, as the mapping of XML architectural forms to SGML architectural forms is pretty obvious. But Hyper-XML is a good name. I'd leave the prose pointing out that the architectural forms will work with SGML, but not let that affect the choice of name. lenReceived on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 16:54:07 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:01 EDT