public-webapi@w3.org from March 2007 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 14 March)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [XHR] Default Content-Type (Saturday, 17 March)

Andrew Sledd

• RE: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events (Friday, 9 March)
• Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events (Friday, 9 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [XHR] Algorithms (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Editorial: typos (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Test cases (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Test cases (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: New draft of Progress events spec (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [XMLHttpRequest] responseText decoding (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XHR] Default Content-Type (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: [XHR] Re: Last Call - XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: XHR and clearing event listeners (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: XHR and clearing event listeners (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: [XHR] Typos and comments (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: upload progress events (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: ElementTraversal spec draft (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Sunday, 4 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: ElementTraversal spec draft (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: New Progress Events spec (Saturday, 17 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• New member - Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: New draft of Progress events spec (Thursday, 29 March)
• New draft of Progress events spec (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Fwd: Re: New progress event draft (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Friday, 16 March)
• ElementTraversal spec draft (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: WheelEvent alignment with MouseWheelEvent (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Network API editor's draft (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Network API editor's draft (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Staff contact job at W3C (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Scope of Progress... (Monday, 5 March)

Chris Holland

• Ian's Cross-Domain XmlHttpRequest Proposal (was: Fwd: several messages on ContextAgnosticXmlHttpRequest) (Thursday, 15 March)

Dan Winship

• [XHR] Re: Last Call - XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 28 February)

Daniel Aquino

• Proposal in regards to dom node selector utilities (Wednesday, 28 March)

David Håsäther

• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods (Friday, 30 March)

denis sureau

• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications (Monday, 19 March)
• [XHR] Some clarifications (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case (Monday, 5 March)

Diego La Monica

• Re: [XHR] Unespected case (Wednesday, 7 March)
• [XHR] Unespected case (Thursday, 1 March)

Geoffrey Garen

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor (Tuesday, 6 March)

Gorm Haug Eriksen

• Re: Network API editor's draft (Thursday, 8 March)

Gottfried Zimmermann

• RE: New Progress Events spec (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 14 March)

Ian Hickson

• Re: File upload interface (fwd) (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Network API editor's draft (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Network API editor's draft (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)

Jean-Yves Bitterlich

• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: New draft of Progress events spec (Thursday, 29 March)
• DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Sunday, 4 March)
• [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments (Sunday, 4 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: New Progress Events spec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Scope of Progress... (Monday, 5 March)

Mike Wilson

• RE: Network API editor's draft (Wednesday, 7 March)

Olli Pettay

• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• XHR and clearing event listeners (Tuesday, 6 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• DOM Core: DOMImplementation.createDocumentType(qualifiedName) requires namespace support (Tuesday, 20 March)

Robin Berjon

• Re: upload progress events (Tuesday, 6 March)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] Editorial: typos (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] "the specification of a proxy"...? (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] Algorithms (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [XHR] Test cases (Friday, 30 March)
• [XHR] Test cases (Friday, 30 March)

Stewart Brodie

• Re: DOM Events (Thursday, 29 March)
• [XHR] Typos and comments (Thursday, 1 March)

Web APIs Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? (Thursday, 8 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 13:37:25 UTC