W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:53:44 +1100
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Andrew Sledd" <Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com>
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.townvujdwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:08:46 +1100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

>
> * Andrew Sledd wrote:
>>initProgressEventNS description needs to make the statement
>>that "the value of the namespaceURI argument must be null."
>
> I don't think so. The point of having the method is that this allows
> others to re-use the interface for new event types, for example, for
> proprietary browser extensions or for rarely used event types defined
> by other organizations, neither of which should define event types in
> no namespace without consulting the WebAPI Working Group.

But for generating the actual events defined in the spec, they should have the null namespace, right? (Which is what Andy means)

cheers

-- 
  Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
  hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9.1     http://opera.com
Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 04:54:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT