W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:53:44 +1100
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Andrew Sledd" <Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com>
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.townvujdwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:08:46 +1100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

> * Andrew Sledd wrote:
>>initProgressEventNS description needs to make the statement
>>that "the value of the namespaceURI argument must be null."
> I don't think so. The point of having the method is that this allows
> others to re-use the interface for new event types, for example, for
> proprietary browser extensions or for rarely used event types defined
> by other organizations, neither of which should define event types in
> no namespace without consulting the WebAPI Working Group.

But for generating the actual events defined in the spec, they should have the null namespace, right? (Which is what Andy means)


  Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
  hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9.1     http://opera.com
Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 04:54:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:23 UTC