W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: upload progress events

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:21:19 -0600
Message-ID: <45EDDB4F.5000601@mit.edu>
To: public-webapi@w3.org

 > In brief, the idea is to use the same set of events
 > for upload and download, but to provide a separate EventTarget
 > attached to the XMLHttpRequest object, which is the target all the
 > upload-related events; XHR itself only dispatches the download events.

Out of curiousity, is that last a hard requirement?

That is would an implementation which dispatches the upload events both 
as "progress" events on xhr.upload and "uploadprogress" events on xhr be 
conformant to the specification.  If so, that would allow existing code 
to continue working while allowing spec-compliant code to also work.

I realize that there is an issue with providing non-standard ways to do 
what the standard allows in that authors might use code that works in 
one UA but not others.  So I'm not even sure doing the above would be a 
good idea.  But would it be allowed per the standard?

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 21:21:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:23 UTC