On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:35:49 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.10 > should have incorporated the substance of most changes I have said I > would make. There is a bit of editorial scrubbing to be done (making > references meet the W3C Manual of Style style, ...). > > I have added a section and example on how to use this in a spec > essentially aiming to follow Maciej's proposal, made the conformance > section try to cover different types of things that could conform in > different ways, and tried to make the structure clearer. One example uses a progressComplete event which isn't specified... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:03:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT