W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: New Progress Events spec

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:53:12 -0400
Message-Id: <p06110402c21d9f3e7fbd@[10.0.1.3]>
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "web API" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Cc: "WAI PF public" <wai-xtech@w3.org>

At 1:02 PM +1100 7 03 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.8
>
>I would appreciate review, and in particular propose to publish this 
>spec as a First Public Working Draft more or less in its current 
>shape.
>
>All other comments and criticisms are of course appreciated...

Have you had a chance to compare notes with the people doing SCXML in
Voice Browser WG?

I had an interesting discussion with them about how to identify the
events returning from a detached, asynchronous process.

<quote
cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-scxml-20070221/#Invoke">

When the <invoke> element is executed, the platform MUST start a new
logical instance of the external service specified in "targettype"
and pass it the data specified by "src", "srcexpr", <content>, or
<param>. The service instance MAY be local or remote. In addition to
the explicit arguments, the platform MUST pass a unique id to the
external service . The external service MUST include the same id in
all events that it returns to the invoking machine. (Syntax TBD.)

</quote>

Al

>
>cheers
>
>Chaals
>
>--
>   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
>   hablo espa˝ol  -  je parle franšais  -  jeg lŠrer norsk
>chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9.1     http://opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 12:53:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT