On 3/20/07 12:29 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Feedback indicated that they should all be in the list, yes. > > So do we have evidence of enough broken content using lowercased method > names so that this special case makes sense? When we tried to remove this quirk from WebKit, the change broke some well-known JavaScript libraries, see <http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8099>. One can extrapolate how common this is likely to be the case in home-grown code. - WBR, Alexey ProskuryakovReceived on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 08:06:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT