W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: upload progress events

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:18:04 +0100
To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "web API" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.torq8exr64w2qv@id-c0020.driveway.uu.nl>

On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:02:42 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> On Mar 06, 2007, at 02:49, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> This would require a change in XHR to adopt the Progress Events spec,  
>> but would considerably simplify Progress Events. Thoughts?
> This is a typical issue with specs that correlate. I'd say that since  
> both specs are controlled by the same WG, and since adding that field to  
> XHR in the the XHR spec doesn't make any sense unless Progress Events  
> are supported, it's fine to extend the XHR interface from within the  
> Progress Events spec. I'll admit I don't have a strong opinion either  
> way though, I just thought I'd bring it up as an option.

I think it would be way better to define how they interact in XHR2,  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 13:18:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:23 UTC