W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > March 2007

Re: upload progress events

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:30:46 -0800
Message-Id: <2E57235F-31A7-4DE3-9BD8-FF7DC09E138F@apple.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, web API <public-webapi@w3.org>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:02:42 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Mar 06, 2007, at 02:49, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> This would require a change in XHR to adopt the Progress Events  
>>> spec, but would considerably simplify Progress Events. Thoughts?
>> This is a typical issue with specs that correlate. I'd say that  
>> since both specs are controlled by the same WG, and since adding  
>> that field to XHR in the the XHR spec doesn't make any sense  
>> unless Progress Events are supported, it's fine to extend the XHR  
>> interface from within the Progress Events spec. I'll admit I don't  
>> have a strong opinion either way though, I just thought I'd bring  
>> it up as an option.
> I think it would be way better to define how they interact in XHR2,  
> actually.

Agreed. Ultimately, it would be good for all specifications with  
elements or objects that are potential sources of progress events to  
document how they apply.

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 15:31:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:23 UTC