Monday, 1 January 2001
Friday, 29 December 2000
- SPath and Identity Constraints
- minor typos in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- minor typos in CR-xmlschema-1-20001024
- file size in XML Schema CR
Wednesday, 27 December 2000
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
- RE: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: [Priority Feedback] More issues with <redefine/>
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: Import and change target namespace is desirable
- RE: (Summary) Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
Tuesday, 26 December 2000
Friday, 22 December 2000
- Re: Ques on how to validate xml against schema
- Re: Ques on how to validate xml against schema
- Ques on how to validate xml against schema
- RE: are there uncountably infinite types?
Thursday, 21 December 2000
- NMTOKENS - more details
- RE: are there uncountably infinite types?
- RE: are there uncountably infinite types?
- RE: are there uncountably infinite types?
- Re: are there uncountably infinite types?
- Redefine - composition of multiple <redefine>s and ordering of <redefine> interpretation
- RE: are there uncountably infinite types?
- Re: are there uncountably infinite types?
- Missing posts!
- Re: are there uncountably infinite types?
Wednesday, 20 December 2000
- Re: [Priority Feedback] More issues with <redefine/>
- Re: [Priority Feedback] More issues with <redefine/>
- Re: xsd:all limitations [was: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allowarbitrary order with occurrence > 1]
- Re: xsd:all limitations [was: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1]
- Re: are there uncountably infinite types?
- Defaulted values and identity_constraint checking
Tuesday, 19 December 2000
- what does "finite-length" mean?
- lexical space of decimal
- are there uncountably infinite types?
- Attention
- Re: <import ... /> Question
- [Priority Feedback] More issues with <redefine/>
- <import ... /> Question
- Re: precise definition needed for establishing identity between components that may appear multiple times (via import)
Monday, 18 December 2000
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?
- Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?
- Re: Extension and Restriction of Wildcard Attribute
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Derivation by restriction
Sunday, 17 December 2000
Saturday, 16 December 2000
Friday, 15 December 2000
- Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?
- URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?
- abstract simpleTypes
- Improved Formatting: 'SchemaDoc' - a Simple Mechanism for Commenting a Schema Would be Desirable
- Part 2 - Clause 4.2.8
- Part 2 - Clause 4.2.7
- Part 2 - Clause 3.3.32
- Part 2 - Clause 3.3.31
- Part 2 - Clause 3.3.30
- Part 2 - Clause 3.3.27
- Part 2 - Clause 3.3.25
- Part 1 - Clause 5.2
- Part 1 - Clause 4.3.8
- Part 1 - Clause 4.3.2
- Part 0 - Clause 4.1
- Part 0 - Clause 3.1
- subtyping
- logical data type
- keyRefs
- aggregation data types
- 'SchemaDoc' - a Simple Mechanism for Commenting a Schema Would be Desirable
- Re: Part 2 (Datatypes): whiteSpace not fixed
- Re: Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- RE: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Part 2 (Datatypes): whiteSpace not fixed
- comments for CR-xmlschema-0-20001024
Thursday, 14 December 2000
- Re: 'century' in schema for datatypes
- 'century' in schema for datatypes
- CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: Import and change target namespace is desirable
Wednesday, 13 December 2000
- RE: Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- RE: Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- RE: Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- RE: Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- xmlschema-0
- Re: Canonical Representation for decimal
- Re: Canonical Representation for decimal
- Re: Import with same targetNamespace as importing schema
- Issues with Contribution: Attribute Default Value
- Required Information Set Items and Properties
Tuesday, 12 December 2000
- RE: <whiteSpace/> and Schema for Datatypes
- Re: <whiteSpace/> and Schema for Datatypes
- RE: <whiteSpace/> and Schema for Datatypes
- <whiteSpace/> and Schema for Datatypes
- Default values for block and final
- Permitting ID attribute on facet element information items
Monday, 11 December 2000
- Import with same targetNamespace as importing schema
- Import and change target namespace is desirable
- Re: [fpml-arch-wg] Canonical Rep for decimal - Schema WG Clarification
- Suggestion: Better default values for %p, %s and addition of comm on namespace prefixes in DTD
- precise definition needed for establishing identity between components that may appear multiple times (via import)
- Re: Canonical Representation for decimal
- RE: (Summary) Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- RE: Extension and Restriction of Wildcard Attribute
- RE: (Summary) Implementation Experience: Notation is NOT a DERIVED type of QName
- Multiple Occurrence of Constraining Facets
- Unable to block derivation of simple type definition
Sunday, 10 December 2000
Wednesday, 8 December 1999
Friday, 8 December 2000
- Substitution Groups?
- Re: Canonical Representation for decimal
- Re: Closure for XML Schemas
- Extension and Restriction of Wildcard Attribute
- Re: Closure for XML Schemas
- Closure for XML Schemas
Thursday, 7 December 2000
Wednesday, 6 December 2000
- RE: embedded space
- Update Information!
- Re: embedded space
- .
- Re: Regex comments
- RE: Hierachy constraining facets
Tuesday, 5 December 2000
- Perl 5.6 reference out of date in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Numeric character references in equivalent character classes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: \i and \I in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Unicode database non-normative reference
- RE: Numeric character references in equivalent character classes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Numeric character references in equivalent character classes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Numeric character references in equivalent character classes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: \i and \I in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Regex comments
- RE: Surrogate blocks as block escapes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- RE: Regex comments
- Re: Regex comments
- Regex comments
Monday, 4 December 2000
- Re: Hierachy constraining facets
- Re: Model Group Definition
- RE: String Lists
- Re: Editorial comments on XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
- Re: binary type with pattern facet
- Re: Hierachy constraining facets
Saturday, 2 December 2000
Friday, 1 December 2000
- RE: String Lists
- String Lists
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Schema DTD doesn't allow xmlns attributes on <annotation>
Thursday, 30 November 2000
- Editorial comments on XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
- can first hex octet omit leading zeros?
- binary type with pattern facet
- RE: if condition
- Re: if condition
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
- if condition
- Canonical Representation for decimal
- Re: need help writing an XML schema - where to turn?
Tuesday, 28 November 2000
- Re: [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Re: Questions about local refs
- Questions about local refs
- NMTOKENS definition - contradiction?
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Security News
Monday, 27 November 2000
- Re: two issues: union , internal subset
- two issues: union , internal subset
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- need help writing an XML schema - where to turn?
Saturday, 25 November 2000
Friday, 24 November 2000
- Surrogate blocks as block escapes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
- Numeric character references in equivalent character classes in CR-xmlschema-2-20001024
Wednesday, 22 November 2000
- Redefine too narrowly defined for attribute and model groups
- Unicode database non-normative reference
- RE: Model Group Definition
Tuesday, 21 November 2000
- RE: Ability to BLOCK redefinition ( .. priority feedback)
- RE: Model Group Definition
- RE: Model Group Definition
- Model Group Definition
Monday, 20 November 2000
Friday, 17 November 2000
- Re: Enforcing values of numbers
- Re: Lists and Strings with patterns
- Constraining facets for ID,IDREF,ENTITY, QName & NOTATION
Thursday, 16 November 2000
Wednesday, 15 November 2000
Tuesday, 14 November 2000
Monday, 13 November 2000
Sunday, 12 November 2000
Saturday, 11 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
Thursday, 9 November 2000
- Part 0: The ubiquitous <sequence> tag
- Re: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- Re: Confused about Primer Example section 4.7 vs Structures Constraint on Complex Types Sec 5.11 Extension particularly 1.1.4.1
- Re: [Moderator Action] problem with http://www.w3.org/2000/09/web data/xsv
- Re: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
Wednesday, 8 November 2000
- Confused about Primer Example section 4.7 vs Structures Constraint on Complex Types Sec 5.11 Extension particularly 1.1.4.1
- XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes; comment on the decimal datatype
- a general comment on namespace related terminology
Tuesday, 7 November 2000
Monday, 6 November 2000
- RE: bottom line - was RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Re: bottom line - was RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- bottom line - was RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- Part 2: datatypes
- At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative!
Saturday, 4 November 2000
Friday, 3 November 2000
- DTD error in XSV?
- RE: Schema, Part 2: Datatypes
- DTD error in XSV?
- DTD error in XSV?
- RE: Implementation Experience: Notation is NOT a DERIVED type of QName
- RE: Implementation Experience: Notation is NOT a DERIVED type of QName
- RE: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- RE: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Re: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- Namespace URI typo?
- Schema, Part 2: Datatypes
- Re: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Re: Implementation Experience: Notation is NOT a DERIVED type of QName
- RE: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Re: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- RE: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Re: Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Implementation Experience: INCORRECT usage of xsi:type in Union Types
- Implementation Experience: Notation is NOT a DERIVED type of QName
- Re: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
Thursday, 2 November 2000
- RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- RE: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- Your Online Trading Account
- Part 2 decimal definition
- IEEE datatypes
- Re: adoption of the XML Schema language
- Re: Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
Wednesday, 1 November 2000
- RE: adoption of the XML Schema language
- Schema for schemas and XML schema DTD
- Re: adoption of the XML Schema language
- Re: adoption of the XML Schema language
- Re: adoption of the XML Schema language
- adoption of the XML Schema language
- typo in "Schema Part 2: Datatypes"
- redundant parameter entity declaration in DTD for Datatype defini tions
- Re: List types,
- List types,
- Re: XML Schema goes to Candidate Recommendation status
- RE: XML Schema goes to Candidate Recommendation status
Monday, 30 October 2000
Saturday, 28 October 2000
Friday, 27 October 2000
- RE: date in user's timezone
- RE: date in user's timezone
- RE: date in user's timezone
- RE: date in user's timezone
- RE: date in user's timezone
- Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name
Thursday, 26 October 2000
- RE: date in user's timezone
- Re: date in user's timezone
- Primer and 2000/08/XMLSchema
- Re: Definition of object hierarchies in XML schema
- date in user's timezone
- Definition of object hierarchies in XML schema
- Re: Congratulations and question to differences
- unused parameter entity in the Part 1 "structures" DTD
- Re: simpleTypes and final
Wednesday, 25 October 2000
- RE: simpleTypes and final
- RE: simpleTypes and final
- Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name
- Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name
- RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name
- simpleTypes and final
- Re: XML Schemas: the wrong name
- RE: XML Schemas: the wrong name
- XML Schemas: the wrong name
- Re: Congratulations and question to differences
- Congratulations and question to differences
- use="required"
Monday, 23 October 2000
- Re: Question concerning use of substitutionGroup and xml:lang
- Question concerning use of substitutionGroup and xml:lang
- Re: Adding attributes to lists
- Re: Adding attributes to lists
- Re: Adding attributes to lists
- Adding attributes to lists
Saturday, 21 October 2000
Friday, 20 October 2000
- subscribing
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Wildcards v xsl:stylesheet
Wednesday, 18 October 2000
- RE: LC-222 revamping occurrence indicators
- RE: all limitations [was: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1]
- RE: Comments and questions on the last call XML Schema working draft
- xsd:all limitations [was: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1]
- Comment on XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Appendix E Regular Expres sion
- [Fwd: Validating XPointer "IDREFs"]
- Re: LC-222 revamping occurrence indicators
Tuesday, 17 October 2000
- Flat file to xml
- Re: Value space of QName
- Re: QName and default namespace
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- XGMML Schema (update)
- Value space of QName
- NOTATION/ENTITY mess
- ENTITY declared constraint
- Value space of ID datatype
- Value space of ENTITY, NOTATION, IDREF
- QName and default namespace
Monday, 16 October 2000
- RE: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- RE: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: LC-215 - Easy Add-ins (i18n Comment on XML Schema Last Call Working Draft)
- Re: LC-215 - Easy Add-ins (i18n Comment on XML Schema Last Call Working Draft)
- Re: LC-215 - Easy Add-ins (i18n Comment on XML Schema Last Call Working Draft)
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
Sunday, 15 October 2000
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
Saturday, 14 October 2000
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- overview of XML Schema actions on i18n datatypes comments
- Re: overview of XML Schema actions on i18n structures comments
- overview of XML Schema actions on i18n structures comments
Friday, 13 October 2000
- Re: [x3d-contributors] LC-150: XML Schema Language Last Call Issue Response: Array Sizes
- Informal presentation on Schemas & SOAP (slides)
- LC-151: typed references - XML Schema Last Call Issue Response
- Re: LC-150: XML Schema Language Last Call Issue Response: Array Sizes
- LC-150: XML Schema Language Last Call Issue Response: Array Sizes
- Re: LC-188, 195, 196, 205, 206, 207 (editorial comments on XML Schema)
- Re: LC-187: Type hierarchy for numerics
- Re: Comment about recursive group definition
- Re: Comment about recursive group definition
Thursday, 12 October 2000
- Re: LC-91: character-entities: Support declaration of character entities?
- LC-187: Type hierarchy for numerics
- Do what you do best. Let our Recruiting Software do the rest.
- Re: Comment about recursive group definition
- Comment about recursive group definition
- XML Query Last Call comments: status
- RE: Tagged/untagged size ratio (was: Re: [x3d-contributors] Array s in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: LC-91: character-entities: Support declaration of character entities?
- LC-202 (XML Query comments on XML Schema last-call draft)
- LC-180 (XML Query comments on XML Schema)
- LC-222 revamping occurrence indicators
- LC-204 (XML Query comments on XML Schema)
Wednesday, 11 October 2000
- RE: Tagged/untagged size ratio (was: Re: [x3d-contributors] Array s in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- RE: Tagged/untagged size ratio (was: Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: Tagged/untagged size ratio (was: Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Tagged/untagged size ratio (was: Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Review comment on XML Schema Part 0: Primer
- RE: Simpletype child should be allowed in <list>
- Re: Simpletype child should be allowed in <list>
- Simpletype child should be allowed in <list>
- RE: Inconsistent usage of memberType(s) on Union
- Re: Inconsistent usage of memberType(s) on Union
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Inconsistent usage of memberType(s) on Union
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: LC-182 single-binding rule
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1 (was: Fwd: Re: xsd:all and xsd:element with max(min)occurs)
- Re: LC-93 disjoint datatypes
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Some comments on primer
- For the record: response on LC-135: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful
- For the record: response on LC-74 Define an explicit name for the urType?
- For the record: response on LC-37 Multi-field keys
Tuesday, 10 October 2000
- RE: LC-93 disjoint datatypes
- LC 177 - Tighten Conformance Rules
- RE: LC-93 disjoint datatypes
- RE: LC-1 specify date/time validity better
- RE: LC-3, 4, 5, 8 (your comments on XML Schema)
- Re: LC-197. scale: Allow negative scale?
- Re: Comments and questions (LC-23 2000 vs 1999)
Monday, 9 October 2000
- 6 Million E-mail addresses for $79!!
- LC-149. extending: Provide guidance on extending schema for schem as?
- LC-197. scale: Allow negative scale?
Tuesday, 10 October 2000
Monday, 9 October 2000
Tuesday, 10 October 2000
- LC-165 xsi:null
- LC-164 dropping xsi:type
- LC-93 disjoint datatypes
- LC-66 name property of urType
- LC-186 naturalizing names from other namespaces
Monday, 9 October 2000
- RE: LC-****
- RE: LC-120 clarifications on datatypes
- LC-23 using 2000 not 1999 in namespace
- RE: Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG resp onse
- For the record: response on LC-102 microparsing: Suggestion: Micr oparsing support in XML Schema
- For the record: response on LC-102 microparsing: Suggestion: Micr oparsing support in XML Schema
- LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- At last, HERBAL V the all natural alternative!
- Re: LC-185 comments from XML Core WG
Sunday, 8 October 2000
- LC-97, XML Schema Last Call Issue 97: hexadecimal notation for integers
- Re: LC-215 - Easy Add-ins (i18n Comment on XML Schema Last Call Working Draft)
- LC-51 Can XML Schema describe XSLT?
- LC-52 Clarify minOccur/maxOccur defaulting?
- LC-14 Define an XPath Type
- Re: LC-185 comments from XML Core WG
- Re: LC-185 comments from XML Core WG
- Re: XML Schema: Have we raised "LocalizeGIs" during the last call phase?
- Re: LC-1 specify date/time validity better
- WOW!!! Highest Payouts Around!!!!!!!!
- LC-191, 211, 212, 213, 214 (XForms comments on XML Schema)
Saturday, 7 October 2000
- LC-96: equivClass: common ancestor type
- LC-49 Streamlining restriction of content models
- LC-41, 48, 50, 87, 88, 114 miscellaneous editorial issues (dup)
- LC-94: Clarify Structures 5.11
- LC-199: A schema for the schemaless
- LC-198: Provide type-information in PSV Infoset
- LC-133: Well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets
- LC-127: Error logging in the infoset
- LC-126: Content Model of <complexType>
- LC-123: Inconsistency in content model for group
Wednesday, 4 October 2000
Saturday, 7 October 2000
- Re: [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- Re: XML Schema: Have we raised "LocalizeGIs" during the last call phase?
- XML Schema: Have we raised "LocalizeGIs" during the last call phase?
- LC-181, LC-183, LC-203 (editorial issues in XML Schema)
- LC-35 typo in XML Schema primer
- LC-79, 80, 81 (editorial comments on XML Schema spec)
- LC-65, 67-72, and 85 (misc editorial issues)
- LC-18, 19, 20, and 17 (editorial suggestions for XML Schema)
- LC-63 stop recursion, before it stops you
- LC-106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
- LC-122 xsd:appinfo
- LC-40 xsi:null and keyref
- LC-100 suggested rewording in 3.8 ...
- LC-42 typos in primer
- LC-47 typo in example
- LC-113, LC-129
- LC-188, 195, 196, 205, 206, 207 (editorial comments on XML Schema)
- LC-17, 24, 25, 26, 28, 20, 30, 31, 34, 78
- LC-53 Shipper/biller vs. shippee/billee
- LC-3, 4, 5, 8 (your comments on XML Schema)
- LC-1 specify date/time validity better
- LC-120 clarifications on datatypes
- LC-86 optional component != mandatory but absent?
- LC-39 typo finalDefault/blockDefault
- LC-38 defaulting for maxOccurs
- LC-22 and LC-173
- LC-41, 48, 50, 87, 88, 114 miscellaneous editorial issues
- LC-11 Date and time period
- Re: Element self-reference???
Friday, 6 October 2000
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- LC-121 Element names should be xml:ids in schemas
- Element self-reference???
- An observation on XML schema limitation
- Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema
- Re: easy way to do a hyper link with xsl?
- WG communication now easier (was: Re: LC-215 easy add-ins)
- Re: LC-210 making DTD for schemas non-normative
- LC-221 date/time types
- LC-222 revamping occurrence indicators
- LC-220 single lexical representations
- LC-219 laying the foundations for better i18n and l10n
- LC-218 solving the C0 control-character issue
- LC-217 pattern facets on complex types
- LC-216 merge mixed, textOnly, and string?
- LC-215 easy add-ins
- LC-210 making DTD for schemas non-normative
- Fwd: LC-21 non-Gregorian dates
- LC-208 renaming equivalence classes
- LC-193 co-occurrence constraints
Thursday, 5 October 2000
Friday, 6 October 2000
- LC-192 comments from DOM
- LC-185 comments from XML Core WG
- LC-178 clarify!
- LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema
Thursday, 5 October 2000
Friday, 6 October 2000
Thursday, 5 October 2000
Friday, 6 October 2000
- LC-27 allowing multiple lexical spaces for floats
- LC-15 allowing hints for initial value of an attribute
- LC-13 extending content models
- LC-172 dropping the ANY wildcard (response to your comment)
- LC-49 Streamlining restriction of content models
Thursday, 5 October 2000
- easy way to do a hyper link with xsl?
- Re: content attribute ?
- Re: content attribute ?
- RE: XML schema extensibility : new facet ?
- content attribute ?
- Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- RE: Response to XML Schema LC-200: Unordered children
- Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- XML schema extensibility : new facet ?
- Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: [x3d-contributors] Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
Wednesday, 4 October 2000
- XML Schema Last Call Issue LC-136: Symbolic Constants
- Arrays in XML Schema - Last Call Issue LC-84 - Schema WG response
- Re: XML Schema issue LC-204 (was: XML Query Comments to XML Schem a (2nd part))
- RE: Schema LC-201. xdoc-keyref: Support cross-document keyref?
- Response to your XML Schema Issue LC-170
- Re: Recurring Data Types / Namespaces?