- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Oct 2000 10:11:18 +0100
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: XML Schema Comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> writes:
> The Namespaces Rec specifies two ways in which QNames can be
> interpreted, which differ in how a QName without a prefix are expanded:
>
> A. For element type names, a prefix-less QName is expanded to have the
> namespace name of the default namespace if there is one, and a null
> namespace name otherwise
>
> B. For attribute names, a prefix-less QName is always expanded to have a
> null namespace name.
Part 1 makes it clear that we take approach (A). I have to say I find
the fact that XSLT has taken (B) to be the single most inconvenient
aspect of the language, and we've had no other requests to support
this behaviour.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2000 05:11:21 UTC