- From: Ashok Malhotra/Watson/IBM <petsa@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:19:57 -0400
- To: "Graham Ross" <gar@thinkshare.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>, "Wm Aegerter" <wca@thinkshare.com>
Graham: Its not as bad as it seems! You should use the lexical representation that allows an optional time zone of your choosing. Here's the problem. By using different timezones you can specify the same period of time in different ways. Some folks do not like this and want a single representation for specifying each unique value. The canonical representation for dates, and similarly for other datatypes that have multiple lexical representations, anoints one of them as "canonical". You don't have to use it. All the best, Ashok "Graham Ross" <gar@thinkshare.com>@w3.org on 10/26/2000 01:28:31 PM Sent by: www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org> cc: "Wm Aegerter" <wca@thinkshare.com> Subject: date in user's timezone Context: SML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, 24 Oct 2000, section 3.3.27, "date" et al. In the Canonical Representation section of the datatype "date" the timezone is constrained to UTC. I think this is a copy/paste error. In my timezone (today it is Pacific Daylight Time) a date, as described, would represent the period from 5 p.m. on the preceding day to 5 p.m. on the day named. It is hard to make a case for this datatype. The objection is germane also to month, year, century, recurringDate, and recurringDay. Similar wording for time, timeInstant, etc. is apparently OK as written because the time elements are explicit. If the date et al. wording is intended as written, it means that no lexical representation can represent the midnight-to-midnight period in another timezone. This makes date less useful, but, more pertinent to the task of writing the specification, it begs for more explanation in the Lexical Representation section. It becomes necessary to explain what it means for a lexical representation to specify a timezone other than UTC. For example, it might determine which Greenwich day is actually intended. Graham Ross ThinkShare Corp. Portland, Oregon gar@thinkshare.com
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 17:20:55 UTC