- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:23:37 +0100
- To: "Schema Comments" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Dan Rupe" <Dan_Rupe@go.com>
Dear Martin Duerst and Dan Rupe: The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several months working through the comments received from the public on the last-call draft of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our last-call comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the last-call comment period have been recorded in our last-call issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/05/12-xmlschema-lcissues). Among other issues, the two of you independently raised the point registered as issue LC-16 ( Dan yours was originally classified LC-132 ), which suggests that XML Schema provide a mechanism for allowing arbitrary order of elements with occurence greater than one. I'm afraid the working group declined to provide such functionality on three grounds; 1. complexity for schema processors 2. the fact that the interpretation usually desired is incompatible with that of SGML's ampersand connector 3. the feeling on the part of some WG members that this is not a pattern of document design to be recommended or supported. It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of the W3C. Regards Martin Gudgin DevelopMentor XML Schema Working Group
Received on Monday, 9 October 2000 03:50:59 UTC