- From: John Punin <puninj@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, John Punin <puninj@cs.rpi.edu>, Moorthy <moorthy@cs.rpi.edu>
Thanks Henry. My corrections were based on section "2.5.3 Empty content" of the XML Schema 0 document. Could you please explain me briefly the differences between these two corrections?. Of course, I like much better your corrections. :-) John On 5 Oct 2000, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Your corrections are correct :-) > > However, the following simpler forms are also OK: > > puninj@cs.rpi.edu writes: > > <xs:element name="et2"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:attribute ...>. . . </xs:attribute> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > > > <xs:complexType name="myelement"> > <xs:attributeGroup ref="myAttrGroup"/> > </xs:complexType> > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ >
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 15:16:38 UTC