- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:56:38 -0400
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
The following is a response to a note sent to the commentator on May 22,
2000. The commentator agrees that this resolution is OK.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus on 10/10/00 10:54 PM -----
Ani Pedersen
<APeders@plex To: "'Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com'" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
us.ca> cc:
Subject: RE: Multi-field key
05/25/00
11:42 AM
You could close it.
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com [mailto:Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 3:21 PM
To: Ani Pedersen
Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Subject: re: Multi-field key
On April 11th, you sent a query [1] to the schemas working group
regarding multi-field keys. I sent you an informal response [2] pointing
out that:
>> <field> can be repeated to create
>> a multi-field key. I think that's what
>> you need
Furthermore, this feature is illustrated in conjunction with <unique> in
our Primer document [3], at the end of section 5.1.
The schemas workgroup has assigned your concern a formal tracking number
(LC37). The workgroup has asked me to verify that your concern has been
adequately addressed. If so, it is our intention to close this issue
without further action. Thank you very much.
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0018
.
html
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0019
.
html
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#specifyingUniqueness
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 23:07:44 UTC