- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:37:44 -0700
- To: "'Mark Swinkels'" <MarkSw@Attachmate.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Swinkels [SMTP:MarkSw@Attachmate.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:15 AM > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > Subject: Simpletype child should be allowed in <list> > > For consistency and to avoid the unnecessary introduction of named types > it > seems that <list> should allow for a simpleType child as well as the > existing 'itemType' attribute. This would bring it into line with > restriction and union which both allow anonymous simpleType children. > Again, mia culpa. Another editing error on my part in the Sept 22 draft. A single simpleType child is allowed for list (making the itemType attribute and simpleType child mutually exclusive). For confirmation, see the declaration of the xsd:list element in the schema for datatypes [1]. pvb References [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-2-20000922/#schema
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 13:51:24 UTC