Extending port types (AKA a scenario for UPnP)
W3C WSDL WG: 6b. Define encoding for non-ASCII characters in request URL
Regrets for May 2 telecon
OASIS ebXML-CPPA specification 1.9 Initial Public Review.
import / include issue
updated part1 docs (editor's drafts)
Ann: Web Service Description Requirements published
URI Escaping and IRIs (was Issues 6a, 6d, 41. Define encoding into a request URL)
Regrets for 2 May and 9 May teleconferences
Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon
- RE: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon
- Re: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon
- Re: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon
Issues 6a, 6d, 41. Define encoding into a request URL
W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
XLANG, WSFL response on solicit-response and output-only
Conflicts of WSDL schemas
Late regrets
RE: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02
Write up question for XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response.
Agenda for 2002-04-25 WS Description WG
W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
- RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
- RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
- RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
- RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
- RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
- Re: Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
- FW: Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
- RE: Open Content Model
IRC
Use cases
RE: minutes from April 18
Usecase document
HTTP Binding Issues
RE: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02
Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document
- RE: Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document
- RE: Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document
Web Services Description Working Group 2002-04-04 (real!) meeting minutes
Web Services Description Working Group 2002-03-28 meeting minutes (was -04-04 minutes)
Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes
- Re: Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes
- RE: Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes
introduction
Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18, 20 02
New wording for R001
Slightly cleaned up Requirements Document 20020417
Issue: Permit "message" attribute in mime:content binding
Issue: MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related
Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service?
- Re: Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service?
- Re: Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service?
Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
- Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
- Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
- RE: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
- RE: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages
- Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages
- Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages
Suggested integration requirement
Use Case: Storage and Retrieval of WSDL in Registries and Repositories
issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
- RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames?
issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
- RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
- Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
- RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
- RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
current editors' draft of the WSDL 1.2 core spec
slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec
- multipe protocols/bindings that implements serviceType [Re: slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec]
Draft Requirements doc reflecting FTF decisions.
Clarification on proposed requirement
- Re: Clarification on proposed requirement
- Re: Clarification on proposed requirement
- Re: Clarification on proposed requirement
- Re: Clarification on proposed requirement
slides for interop issues talk
slides for WSDl, NE
Snapshot of Requirements draft after Apr 11th decisions
RE: Requirements 4.11 Security
Requirements 4.1 General draft disposition
F2F
RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments)
Draft Requirements Section 4.5 recommendations
Web Services Description Working Group 2002-04-04 meeting minutes
Initial impression about requirements placed by WSCL on WSDL
Revised Agenda April 10-12 Face-to-face meeting.
Requirements 4.12 and 5 draft disposition
[Fwd: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1]
RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments)
- RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments)
- Re: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments)
RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements)
W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
R067 and R967a: extensibility
DR028: describe SOAP 1.2 messages
Re: [rdfws] Re: RDF mapping for WSDL
W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements
R060: Description of message exchanges and protocol binding
RE: Higher-level support for SOAP extensions/modules
Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- RE: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
- Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1