RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements

I'd like to suggest the following changes to the reqs that I have initially submitted:

R093: please move it to section "4.5 Messages and Types".

R096: It says (Merged in R085.). From the existing wording of R085 I don't exactly see how they were merged. I suggest either rephrase R085 to clearly state the requirement to cover references to other services or leave R096 if the intention of R085 is different.

R094: It is covered by R036. Can be rejected for that reason.

R097: I'd suggest change it to "Must". (Now, this is NOT covered by R036!)

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer [mailto:jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:57 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements


The WG made some progress during the teleconference this week. Please find attached an updated requirements draft that accepts 4 requirements, rejects 10, and provides some minor rewording of issues in Section 4.7 InterfaceBindings. It also marks a proposal to simplify requirements in Sections 4.5 Messages and Types and Section 4.9 Extensibility.

Your feedback is welcome; please note that the WG face-to-face meeting is imminent.

--Jeff 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:26 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements

Please find attached an updated requirements draft that includes revised definitions and proposed simplifying requirements in Sections 4.6 and 4.7.

There is also one new, draft requirement (R112) about message meta data.


As you may know, the WG is planning a face-to-face meeting in early April. Your feedback is always welcome, but it is particularly valuable now as the WG prepares for that meeting.

--Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:38 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements

Please find attached an updated requirements draft that includes the recent definitions drafted by David Booth; these should help us all get on the same page re: the wording and intent of remaining requirements.

Because we didn't discuss any requirements at the most recent teleconference, there are no changes in the accepted / rejected requirements. (And no new requirements either.)

Feedback welcome.

--Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:00 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements


Pretty quiet on the list and some modest progress during the teleconference. Please find attached an updated requirements draft that accepts 3 requirements and rejects 7. (No new requirements!)

Feedback welcome.

--Jeff

P.S. If the HTML attachment is stripped, you can retrieve it from the discussion list archive at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/>.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements


Less input this week, but the WG made modest progress during the teleconference. Please find attached an updated requirements draft that accepts 5 requirements, rejects 6, and adds reworded DR109. It also marks a proposal to simplify requirements in Section 3.2, and it adds DR110 for a newly submitted requirement.

Feedback welcome.

--Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:47 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements


Thank you again for your continued input. Please find attached an updated requirements draft with several changes.

First, this draft notes that 5 MUST requirements have been accepted by the working group; some of these have simplified and/or clarified wording.

Second, this draft marks 4 requirements as duplicates of others and thus not (separate) requirements.

Finally, this draft includes 7 new requirements from the community. Note that for the sake of process, I made a guess at the priority of these requirements.

Thanks again for your input.

--Jeff 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Schlimmer 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:20 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements


Thank you all for your additional requirements, early feedback, and clarification for the W3C Web Service Description Working Group (WG). Please find attached an updated requirements draft with several changes.

First, it includes 17 new requirements. If you have any additional requirements, the WG will be pleased to consider them on a case-by-case basis.

Second, for the sake of process, I made an educated guess at the priority of each requirement. Borrowing from RFC 2119, MUST requirements are the highest priority, MAY are low, and SHOULD are somewhere in between. (See the updated draft for specific language.) The WG will begin discussing this prioritization at our next meeting. You'll note that no requirement is yet marked MAY, though I expect that will change soon. Your feedback on the relative priority of the requirements is most welcome.

Thank you again for your input. I look forward to working with you all to come up with a clear, focused requirements document that provides a great foundation for the WG effort.

--Jeff

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 18:30:44 UTC