- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 06:56:22 -0400
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
>"Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk> writes: > >Yes, the references across NSs always have to be QNames. I believe > >telling whether a name is a QName or an NCName is simple- just see > >whether there's a colon or not. > > but an unprefixed value, is still a valid QName. Isn't it a QName with a null namespace URI? Is there a difference between that and an NCName?? > It sounds to me like its just making it more complex, not less. Stick > with QNames and make it clearer in the prose. That would be my own personal preference too! Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 06:59:19 UTC