- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:54:52 +0200
- To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Prasad, isn't this covered by issue 51 [1] already? Jean-Jacques. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html Prasad Yendluri wrote: > After thinking a little more, it seems to me this would be a useful > addition. > > Usecase: A response message could optionally return one or more > "attachments". > > We do have an example of having attachments in the MIME binding section > of the specification (Section 5.11 Example 7) but, there is no way to > specify those as optional with variable cardinality (minoccurs, > maxoccurs). The example claims these are optional in the description > part but, neither the "message" definitions (A 4.1 WSDL schema) nor the > MIME bindings ( 4.4 MIME binding Schema) permit this. > > Regards, Prasad
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 05:55:54 UTC