- From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:50:53 -0500
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
These may already be noted but we have run into 2 inconsistencies between the WSDL spec and the SOAP binding schema. 1. Section 3.7 of the WSDL spec states that the soap:header and soap:headerfault elements take a required 'part' attribute of type NMTOKEN, but the schema in the spec and at http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/ state that the attribute is 'parts' and of type NMTOKENS. 2. Section 3.7 of the WSDL spec states that soap:headerfault elements are optional, but they aren't in the schema both in the spec and at http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/. David Cleary Progress Software > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:51 AM > To: Web Service Description > Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana > Subject: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 > > > Dear all, > > I seem to have volunteered myself for collecting an initial list > of issues against the WSDL 1.1 specification. > > I you have any such issue, can you please send them to me asap so > I can add them to our issues list _before_ our first face-to-face > meeting? > > Thank you, > > Jean-Jacques. > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 15:50:58 UTC