- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 19:35:17 +0600
- To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Now that the other issues seem to have died down, I'd like to start on the following two issues: <issue id="issue-clarify-import"> <head>Clarify semantics of import.</head> We have run into many, many people who appear to be confused about how import is supposed to work. The notion that it only establishes a relationship between a namespace and a location is quite hard to grasp it appears. Specifically, the fact that nothing is said about what one may find about the namespace at that location appears to be very confusing. We need to clarify the intended semantics at the minimum. <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> </issue> <issue id="issue-add-include"> <head>Should we add an "include" mechanism?</head> It appears that most users who use <import> really treat it as an include mechanism. Should we bite the bullet and have both import and include mechanisms similar to XSLT? <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> </issue> Please provide your input on how these should be resolved! Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 09:38:21 UTC