- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:24:58 +0200
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- CC: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Added. Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Sure, we are tracking WSDL 1.1 issues [1], perhaps you could check to > see if these are already covered there. If not, we'll ask the editors > to add them. > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net] > > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 2:46 AM > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: HTTP Binding Issues > > > > Is there an organized way for you guys to get WSDL feature requests > > smaller than a formal requirement? > > > > There are a variety of annoying limitations in the HTTP binding: > > > > * operation addresses should not be required to be relative > > > > * each operation in a binding should choose its own method, not one > for > > all > > > > * any HTTP method should be allowed > > > > * need a way to set HTTP headers > > > > * need a way to specify an authentication requirement > > > > Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 05:25:46 UTC