- From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:57:21 -0400
- To: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Here are the minutes from today's conference call: Web Services Description Working Group Conference Call April 18, 2002 Agenda ----------- 1. Attendance 2. Approval of minutes 3. New minutes process review 4. Review of Action items. 5. Coordination with WS Arch WG 6. Requirements doc. 7. WG approval to publish requirements and usage scenarios documents. 8. Tracking new issues 9. Issues discussion. Attendance ----------------- Present: *Mike Ballantyne Electronic Data Systems David Booth W3C Allen Brookes Rogue Wave Software Roberto Chinnici Sun Microsystems Glen Daniels Macromedia Youenn Fablet Canon Dietmar Gaertner Software AG Mario Jeckle DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology Tom Jordahl Macromedia Jacek Kopecky Systinet *Sandeep Kumar Cisco Systems Philippe Le Hégaret W3C Steve Lind AT&T *Kevin Canyang Liu SAP Pallavi Malu Intel Jonathan Marsh Microsoft Corporation *Mike McHugh W. W. Grainger *Don Mullen Tibco Waqar Sadiq Electronic Data Systems Adi Sakala IONA Technologies Jeffrey Schlimmer Microsoft Corporation Igor Sedukhin Computer Associates Sandra Swearingen U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force *William Stumbo Xerox Jerry Thrasher Lexmark Sanjiva Weerawarana IBM Corporation Joyce Yang Oracle Prasad Yendluri webMethods, Inc. * lost due to technical difficulties. Regrets: Michael Champion Software AG Laurent De Teneuille L'Echangeur Tim Finin University of Maryland Dan Kulp IONA Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle Corporation Jean-Jacques Moreau Canon Jochen Ruetschlin DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology Arthur Ryman IBM Krishna Sankar Cisco Systems Dave Solo Citigroup William Vambenepe Hewlett-Packard Company Don Wright Lexmark Absent: Keith Ballinger Microsoft Corporation Mike Davoren W. W. Grainger Michael Mealling Verisign Dale Moberg Cyclone Commerce Johan Pauhlsson L'Echangeur Stefano Pugliani Sun Radhika Roy AT&T Daniel Schutzer Citigroup Approval of minutes ----------------------------- Last conference call: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/04-minutes.html Face-2Face: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Apr/0050.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Apr/0052.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Apr/0060.html April 4th - Approved F2F minutes - Approved Problems with Verizon switch is preventing many from calling in New minutes process -------------------------------- Details at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Apr/0062.html Highlights: - Publish agenda's to public list - Publish minutes to public list, omitting 'sensitive' info. - Dialing details will go to admin list. - Corrections are sent to the public list. TomJ: How does the attendance list get to the scribe? Jonathan will send in Email to the scribe. Call adjourned to another conference call bridge. Action Items ------------------- DONE 2002.02.14 Jonathan: Map Face-to-Face meetings 6 months in advance. - Dates and places on web page http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html IN PROGRESS 2002.04.04 Editors to get CVS requests to Philippe. KEITH ABSENT 2002.03.07 Keith. Discuss open content model design. DONE 2002.03.21 Editors (Jeff/Sanjiva). Do presentations of top 5 broken items in WSDL 1.1 at the F2F. DONE 2002.04.04 Everyone to read the use cases and send e-mail raising issue for the FTF. DONE? 2002.04.04 Jeffrey to rephrase R083 IN PROGRESS 2002.04.10 Sanjiva - add inconsistent use of port and endpoint to issues list Arthur - work on text for a requirement to define equivalence of wsdl document DONE (by Jonathan) 2002.04.10 Jeffrey Schlimmer to remove expected version annotations. PENDING 2002.04.11 Keith B. will write up descriptions for issues discussed in presentations and add to issue lists if not there yet. due date: next conference call. DONE 2002.04.11 Sanjiva W. will post descriptions for issues discussed in presentations and add to issue lists if not there yet. due date: next conference call PENDING 2002.04.11 Jeff Schlimmer Add UPNP example to use cases. DONE 2002.04.12 David Booth ask Eric for clarification and will cc RDF interest group. DONE 2002.04.12 Jeffery, Sandeep, Waqar - have drafts ready by next telcon on Thursday 4/18. NEW ACTION - 2002.04.18 - Waqar will identify use cases to remove. NEW ACTION - 2002.04.18 - Waqar will post by next Tuesday a draft. Publish if no objections at the next telecon. DONE 2002.04.12 JM will pursue use case task force with coordination group. Coordination with WS Arch WG ---------------------------- Jonathan: - Arch group has proposed they own the Glossary and Usage Scenarios docs. - Description will not create their own, just comment on theirs. Waqar: concern that we might not like the docs we have to use. Jonathan: doesn't see any reason why our feedback would be ignored Glen: our usage may be more detailed than theirs Jonathan: Use cases would be more detailed than usage scenarios and slightly different TomJ: Let 'em have it, and lets get on to WSDL Requirements doc -------------------------- Latest doc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/att-0104/01-ws-desc-reqs-20020417.html Jonathan moved rejects to the bottom. Still editorial work to be done NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jeffery will clean up R001 Proposed new wording for R001 from Dave Booth: [Accepted, Must, Charter] The language developed by the WG must permit any programming model, transport or protocol for communication between peers. (Last revised 21 Feb 2002.) New requirement from Mark Baker: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0075.html Jonathan wants to add as a draft requirement. No objections WG approval to publish requirements and usage scenarios documents ----------------------------------------------------------------- NEW ACTION: 2002.04.18 Jeffery will clean up requirements document, and we will have a publishable draft by next Tuesday, Publication process will start after conference call Thursday. Discussion about how the review process will work. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jonathan, Philippe Investigate setting up new mailing list for review comments. Tracking new issues ----------------------- NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Sanjiva Add 5 new issues raised by Prasad in Email to the issues list. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list to use cases. Issues discussion ------------------ Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Thread starts at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0059.html Prasad: Wants to keep them. JacekK: Address on port don't make sense for these operations Various arguments that something *like* solicit-response should be kept in the spec JeffS: It's not obvious to me that we need to keep solicit-response in the spec. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Prasad Write up question for XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jonathan Solicit input from XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response. Issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Thread starts at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0061.html Tabled till next time due to time limitations. Summary of New Action Items --------------------------- NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Waqar will identify use cases to remove. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Waqar will post by next Tuesday a draft. Publish if no objections at the next telecon. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jeffery will clean up R001 NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jonathan, Philippe Investigate setting up new mailing list for review comments. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Sanjiva Add 5 new issues raised by Prasad in to the issues list. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Prasad Write up question for XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response. NEW ACTION 2002.04.18 Jonathan Solicit input from XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response.
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 12:58:01 UTC