- From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:57:31 -0700
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:20:34 -0400, in soap you wrote: >The WG would like to solicit your comments on whether we should >support references within a WSDL document with just an NCName >instead of always requiring a QName. > >Here's the issue from the latest part1 document: > ><issue id="issue-references-with-qname"> > <head>Should intra-namespace references using only localParts be > supported?</head> > WSDL 1.1 requires all references to be QNames. For example, a > reference to a portType from a binding element must always use > a QName even if that portType is in the same namespace and even > if it is defined in the same document. It would be convenient > to support local part references for intra-namespace references. > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> ></issue> > >Sanjiva. What happens in the case where you need to cross a namespace boundary ?, switch back to QNames ? How do you tell if its a QName or an NCName ? Cheers Simon www.pocketsoap.com
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2002 11:57:06 UTC