Possible Bug
bad link
BSAMO invites you to promote your music.
BSAMO invites you to promote your music.
Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
Please delete my name
valid HTML 4.01 picture -> missing transparency
Feature Request: Send Accept header
- Re: Feature Request: Send Accept header
- Re: Feature Request: Send Accept header
- Re: Feature Request: Send Accept header
Broken links to privacy statements
Error in W3c HTML 4.01 validator?
Page Valet updated
/check/referer not working
icon valid html 4.01 strict
validating dynamically generated pages that use 'post' data
Transparency of "valid-html401.png"
/BR
Form Element Content in ISO/IEC 15445:2000(ISO-HTML)
ID 'FOO' already defined
Validator trying to validate javascript as HTML
- Re: Validator trying to validate javascript as HTML
- Re: Validator trying to validate javascript as HTML
XHTML 1.0 Transitional-I don't understand, why my page is not valid.
- Re: XHTML 1.0 Transitional-I don't understand, why my page is not valid.
- Re: XHTML 1.0 Transitional-I don't understand, why my page is not valid.
W3 Validator Page Doesn't Validate
SVG 1.0 DTD has been updated
validator-bug
Demande d''inscription
validator validating non valid page
Rhett Tyler
[TN]
French Interface?
checklink:
FOO and BAR
checklink: HTML Validity Link Broken
Just a small point
We provide for best foucet
page validates before web host gets to it
Revisiting EARL for Validation
[www-validator] <none>
validation in Opera
- Re: validation in Opera
- Tangent: validation in Opera
- Re: validation in Opera
- Re: validation in Opera
- Re: validation in Opera
- Re: validation in Opera
Tip of the day: Cool URIs don't change
Broken Links on the Webpage
validation of whitespace before the XML prologue
Validator & URL issue
xhtml form name bug
an usability suggestion
XML-compatible Empty Tags?
Wording on the validator site
Validating & in urls
Trouble including URL
little bug in parsing style attribute
Fwd: All right I'm new at this
w3c online test put junk in code
- Re: w3c online test put junk in code
- Re: w3c online test put junk in code
- Re: w3c online test put junk in code