- From: Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:33:05 +0100
- To: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-validator-0007@earth.li>, <www-validator@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, Am Donnerstag, 27. März 2003 19:44 schrieb Tim Bagot: > At 2003-03-27T09:25+0100, Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:- > > > I want the validator to have an option to send a specific Accept > > header to the server site that is going to be validated. Thus it is > > not possible to validate negotiated content. (e.g. try validating > > http://www.itcqis.com/ will validate the HTML 4.01 version, though > > mozilla will retrieve the XHTML 1.1 version). > > Why can't you just ask the validator to validate e.g. > <http://www.itcqis.com/start.de.xhtml>? Seems easier than setting an > Accept header (and indeed Accept-Language). I could do. I don't use the validator at all. I use Ant and Xerces to validate my XHTML, and I'm always pretty convinced my transformed HTML4 is valid, too, but to be sure I use htmltidy, which also has some other advantages. The servers negotiating content are configured to send HTML4 as text/html per default and only send XHTML1.1 as application/xhtml+xml if the user agent prefers that over text/html (which, e.g., Mozilla does). When someone now validates one of my websites using the W3C Validator, he / she will think the site is old HTML 4, which I don't like because the site is XHTML 1.1 and HTML 4 is only there for backwards compatibility with antique browsers like Internet Explorer. Bye - -- ITCQIS GmbH Christian Wolfgang Hujer Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Telefon: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 37 Telefax: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 39 E-Mail: Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com WWW: http://www.itcqis.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+hBbRzu6h7O/MKZkRAsU4AJ4gqtE9hgNLZKjMisNQSQXazpMQvwCguq6c grz2rhIcsJcMU+lcvSWKsJw= =C2wD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 04:34:28 UTC