Friday, 31 January 2003
- checklink: links into RDF bug
- Re: W3C Link Checker uses unregistered media type
- Re: BUG
- Re: BUG
- W3C Link Checker uses unregistered media type
- BUG
- Re: Validator Question
- Re: Fwd: Validator Question
- Fwd: Validator Question
Thursday, 30 January 2003
Wednesday, 29 January 2003
- Re: Using slash inside font-tag does not validate
- Re: [www-validator] <none>
- Re: [www-validator] <none>
- Re: Using slash inside font-tag does not validate
- [www-validator] <none>
- Using slash inside font-tag does not validate
- Re: 500 Can't connect to www.peepo.com:80 (Bad hostname 'www.peepo.com')
- Re: 500 Can't connect to www.peepo.com:80 (Bad hostname 'www.peepo.com')
- Re: 500 Can't connect to www.peepo.com:80 (Bad hostname 'www.peepo.com')
- Re: 500 Can't connect to www.peepo.com:80 (Bad hostname 'www.peepo.com')
- 500 Can't connect to www.peepo.com:80 (Bad hostname 'www.peepo.com')
Tuesday, 28 January 2003
Monday, 27 January 2003
Sunday, 26 January 2003
Saturday, 25 January 2003
- Re: nosgml options
- Re: nosgml options
- Re: What is "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" ?
- Re: Is this the wrong place?
Friday, 24 January 2003
- Implementation of W3C HTML validator on Intranet (NT and IIS 4)
- Is this the wrong place?
- Re: CSS optimizer?
- Re: What is "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" ?
Thursday, 23 January 2003
- Re: nosgml options
- CSS optimizer?
- Re: RFE: allow location spoofing in online validator
- Re: RFE: allow location spoofing in online validator
- Re: nosgml options
- Re: nosgml options
- Re: What is "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" ?
- Re: nosgml options
- Re: nosgml options
- nosgml options
- What is "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" ?
Wednesday, 22 January 2003
- Re: unvalid HTML in Valid HTML stamp code
- Re: unvalid HTML in Valid HTML stamp code
- unvalid HTML in Valid HTML stamp code
- Re: Button Type validation
- Re: Button Type validation
- Re: checklink is apparently not one of the 10000 debian packages yet
- Button Type validation
- Re: Bug in www-validator?
- Bug in www-validator?
- Re: checklink is apparently not one of the 10000 debian packages yet
Tuesday, 21 January 2003
- RFE: allow location spoofing in online validator
- "border" with Netscape 4.75
- Re: Error on page: http://validator.w3.org/source/
- Re: Error on page: http://validator.w3.org/source/
- Error on page: http://validator.w3.org/source/
Monday, 20 January 2003
- Re: Support data URI scheme.
- Re: Lack of opening <html> and it still validates
- Lack of opening <html> and it still validates
- Re: Support data URI scheme.
- Sending the wrong message wrt DOCTYPE and charset
Sunday, 19 January 2003
Saturday, 18 January 2003
- Re: Possible mistake regarding 4.01 Strict validation of <a>
- Possible mistake regarding 4.01 Strict validation of <a>
- UNBESCHRÄNKTER VERDIENST VON ZU HAUSE AUS!
Thursday, 16 January 2003
Thursday, 9 January 2003
Thursday, 16 January 2003
- Recommended Valid HTML check/referer no longer works
- Re: [henri@w3.org: Re: [Moderator Action] Is part of your site down?]
- [henri@w3.org: Re: [Moderator Action] Is part of your site down?]
- Re: W3C validator - html4 - bug report
Tuesday, 14 January 2003
Wednesday, 15 January 2003
Tuesday, 14 January 2003
Monday, 13 January 2003
- Re: Invalid pages on the validator site
- Invalid pages on the validator site
- Re: JSP error?
- JSP error?
Sunday, 12 January 2003
- Re: slighty ot: Valid Documents
- Re: Bug when there's a ":" in error message...
- Bug when there's a ":" in error message...
Saturday, 11 January 2003
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/check is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/check is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/check is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict
- http://validator.w3.org/check is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict
Friday, 10 January 2003
- Re: Local validator from commandline
- Re: Suggested change: Error message on attempt to Validate non-existing file
- Re: Local validator from commandline
- Re: HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
- Re: HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
Thursday, 9 January 2003
Friday, 10 January 2003
- Re: Possible bug in the SGML parser?
- A goof on my part..
- Possible bug in the SGML parser?
- Suggested change: Error message on attempt to Validate non-existing file
- Re: HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
- Re: HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
- HTTP header 'Accept' should be sent by Validator
- "detect automatically"
- Fallbacks
- checklink: CLEOBEBE@WEBTV.NET
- Re: iso_8859-1
- Re: iso_8859-1
Thursday, 9 January 2003
- Re: Local validator from commandline
- Local validator from commandline
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- iso_8859-1
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: detailed.html vs table.tmpl (trivial patch)
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- detailed.html vs table.tmpl (trivial patch)
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
- Re: main::iana_charset_blurb()
Wednesday, 8 January 2003
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
Monday, 6 January 2003
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
- Re: improvements for validator.w3.org/check
- Re: error? in W3C HTML Validator re: name attribute
- Re: Validation results.
- error? in W3C HTML Validator re: name attribute
Tuesday, 31 December 2002
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
Wednesday, 1 January 2003
Monday, 30 December 2002
Thursday, 2 January 2003
Monday, 30 December 2002
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
Tuesday, 31 December 2002
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
Monday, 6 January 2003
- Re: validator error explanation
- Re: validator error explanation
- Re: validator error explanation
- validator error explanation
Sunday, 5 January 2003
- long quip
- Re: JavaScript messes up validator
- Re: JavaScript messes up validator
- Re: JavaScript messes up validator
- JavaScript messes up validator
Friday, 3 January 2003
Tuesday, 31 December 2002
Friday, 3 January 2003
- memoir
- Re: Validator Problem
- icon WC3 in PNG have not a transparence background
- Installing from cvs HEAD - feedback
- Validator Problem