Possible bug in the SGML parser?

I think i've found a bug, not sure, but try validating
http://www.whalan.com/invalid_html/Upload%20Art.htm and viewing the source.

Its a file a friend of mine generated and there has been much arguments over
the validity of it, as I'm a sucker for standards adherance (mostly).

It lacks opening <head> and <body> tags, and yet it validates as 4.01
transitional (when i force it), this is the crux of the argument.

Doesnt a well formed SGML document REQUIRE a matching opening tag for a
closing tag?

The fate of a heated argument rests on your reply :)

Kind Regards,

Andrew Whalan

Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 08:15:28 UTC