Saturday, 1 September 2001
Friday, 31 August 2001
- Lets start a romantic affair
- AW: mailto & attach
- AW: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- mailto & attach
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- xhtml
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
Thursday, 30 August 2001
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
Monday, 27 August 2001
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
Sunday, 26 August 2001
Friday, 24 August 2001
- Re: CSS-P or something else
- Re: CSS-P or something else
- RE: HTML vs. PDF
- CSS-P or something else
- RE: HTML vs. PDF
- HTML vs. PDF
Thursday, 23 August 2001
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
- AW: Suggestion: <link rel="script">
- Re: Suggestion: <link rel="script">
- Re: Suggestion: <link rel="script">
- Re: BODY content model and ADDRESS in ISO-HTML
- Re: Suggestion: <link rel="script">
- Suggestion: <link rel="script">
- Re: [off topic]Please, wait for Symbolic Names next message.
- [off topic]Please, wait for Symbolic Names next message.
Saturday, 18 August 2001
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going? (PR#570)
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
Friday, 17 August 2001
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going? (PR#570)
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: How to be markup LABEL element with two or more fields.
- Netscape Form Problem
Thursday, 16 August 2001
- Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going? (PR#570)
- Re: How to be markup LABEL element with two or more fields.
- Re: Errors in XHTML's Character Entities!
- Re: List elements (was: Tree Presented Lists )
- How to be markup LABEL element with two or more fields.
Monday, 13 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- Element prohibitions in XHTML
- Processing Instructions in XHTML 1.0
- State of named character reference apos in XHTML
- Re: White space and inline elements
- Re: In regard to the subject Symbolic Name For Every Character
- Small re. In regard to the subject Symbolic Name ...
- HTTP connection and multiple servers...
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Monday, 13 August 2001
- Latest Version
- Re: Idea re: transparency
- Re: Classes Considered Harmful
- Re:
- Re: Classes Considered Harmful
- Idea re: transparency
- RE: Positive Re. Symbolic name for every character
Sunday, 12 August 2001
- Re: Classes Considered Harmful
- Re: Are always TARGET attribute values CI?
- Canonical XHTML
- Re: Classes Considered Harmful
- Re: XHTML m12n Hacking
- XHTML m12n Hacking
- XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?
- Re: Classes Considered Harmful
- Re: I want out!!! [off-topic]
Saturday, 11 August 2001
- Continuation of Symbolic Name For Every Character.
- Re: I want out!!! [off-topic]
- Re: I want out!!!
- Re: Positive Re. Symbolic name for every character
Friday, 10 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- RE: BODY content model and ADDRESS in ISO-HTML
- Re: List elements (was: Tree Presented Lists )
- Re: List elements (was: Tree Presented Lists )
- RE: tfoot is screwed is up
- RE: tfoot is screwed is up
- tfoot is screwed is up
- BODY content model and ADDRESS in ISO-HTML
- RE: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Monday, 6 August 2001
- <dynamic> element idea (was: <dynamic> tag idea)
- RE: Symbolic name for every character.
- Re: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- re subscription problems
- Re: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- Re: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- Re: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- Re: Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- Q/Sugestion about XHTML
- Re: <dynamic> tag idea
- Re: Symbolic name for every character.
Friday, 3 August 2001
Sunday, 5 August 2001
Saturday, 4 August 2001
Friday, 3 August 2001
- RE: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- RE: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- Re: What is expected behavior when a user tabs on the select box whic h doesn't contain any option?
Thursday, 2 August 2001
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
Thursday, 2 August 2001
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- CSS boxes
- Re: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- RE: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- Re: Content type of TR/ruby/xhtml-ruby-1.mod
- Re: Content type of TR/ruby/xhtml-ruby-1.mod
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- Content type of TR/ruby/xhtml-ruby-1.mod
- RE: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- Re: Alternative to NOBR tag?
- Alternative to NOBR tag?
- Re: Are always TARGET attribute values CI?
- Re: Questions on the Extensibility of XHTML
- Re: Wrong MIME type for XML DTDs
- Re: Wrong MIME type for XML DTDs
- Re: Are always TARGET attribute values CI?