Re: XHTML 2.0: Where Is It Going?

* Sean B. Palmer wrote:
>> I do care, since I want to deliver my documents to user
>> agents and therfore I need an applicable MIME type.
>And you think that text/html is an inappropriate MIME type for XHTML 1.1
>and Basic? Hmm...

Think? Yes. Like? Not in general.

>> I want to use XHTML 1.1 do *be* strict.
>> If I want legacy features, I won't use XHTML 1.1.
>And if you want to use Ruby?

I don't want that without browser support.
Björn Höhrmann { }
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 {
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 }

Received on Friday, 17 August 2001 20:40:33 UTC