- From: Daniel Hiester <alatus@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:18:31 -0700
- To: "www-html" <www-html@w3.org>
(I said) >> ...I am confident that one could already use just OL or >> just UL (whichever tickles your fancy), and use stylesheets >> to control how you want it to look. I don't think it makes >> a huge difference whether you state in the markup that it's >> an ordered list or an unordered list, because the UA will >> still only render the list in whatever order the author >> puts it. (Fantasai said) >Now you're thinking in terms of presentation. Exactly. My angle when I wrote all of that is that, as far as the UA is concerned, the only different between a UL and an OL is the term of presentation, which I wanted to see pushed over into stylesheets. But I suppose I finally cave in, and admit what you and some others here have said is correct; semantics must, after all, be important to the author of the HTML document. Kind of like the difference between P and DIV; both are used to create line breaks, and indicate that the two P's or two DIV's are supposed to represent a different portion of the text flow, but there is a very important difference between those two. [and no, I'm not dumb enough to even consider using DIV in any way even remotely similar to P :-)] Daniel
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 13:10:01 UTC