- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 04:28:13 +0200
- To: "Bert Johnson" <bert@geekspotting.com>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
* Bert Johnson wrote:
>I write to you with a proposal for a new tag in the HTML/XHTML protocol.
Protocols define communication processes, XHTML doesn't and is thefore
no protocol; it's a markup language.
>I propose the dynamic content tag (maybe <dynamic></dynamic>). This tag
>would be very convenient for spiders, parsers, and page update notifiers.
>
>My budding company (Johnso Productions) is in the finalizing stages of the
>Johnso Page Update Notifier - which parses pages and alerts you if there
>have been recent modifications. The problem is that many pages contain
>dynamic "random" content, such as quotes of the day, member counts, or
>timestamps. By putting those non-static fields between <dynamic> tags,
>it would allow many autonomous tasks to run easier.
You don't want to markup dynamic content, you want to markup unimportant
sections of a document. If something isn't important, user may or should
ignore them, so let's call that element <ignore>. Why should authors
insert informations into a document that are ment to be ignored? Or why
should they even mark them up as such? No, I don't see what value this
adds to XHTML. It's up to you, the one who wants to figure out, if a
page has changed, to take ignorable portions into consideration. You
should observe the relevant page for some time and see what sections
change very regularly and ignore those portions.
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2001 22:28:52 UTC