- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:41:36 +0100
- To: (wrong string) ärber" <list-w3c-html@faerber.muc.de>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
> For software, it does not make a difference whether it is the > version above or one of these: [...] > In all of these cases, there is nothing that would assign any > meaning to the element. True. > What we would need is an extension to (X)HTML, possibly > defined as a module, introducing new elements with a prose > that defines their semantics. No, that wouldn't work (or if it did, it would be a bit of a hack) because you can't accurately address class names. The solution I gave to that was to make class names a list of QNames that resolve to URIs using an RDF-style concatenation mechanism. They can then be defined by formats such as RDF. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 15:46:33 UTC