www-archive@w3.org from July 2009 by date

Friday, 31 July 2009

• Re: Publishing a new draft of CSSOM View Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 30 July 2009

• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Daniel Veditz
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Gervase Markham
• Re: minor bug in WebIDL of HTMLMarqueeElement in HTML5 Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Wednesday, 29 July 2009

• Re: Publishing a new draft Sam Ruby
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Ian Hickson
• RE: Publishing a new draft Larry Masinter
• RE: Publishing a new draft Larry Masinter
• Re: Publishing a new draft Sam Ruby
• Re: Publishing a new draft Lachlan Hunt

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

• Publishing a new draft of CSSOM View Anne van Kesteren
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Renato Iannella

Monday, 27 July 2009

• Re: [whatwg] A New Way Forward for HTML5 (revised) Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 26 July 2009

• Re: minor bug in WebIDL of HTMLMarqueeElement in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• Re: minor bug in ABNF of 4.3.1.2 Ian Hickson

Friday, 24 July 2009

• prev-archive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Renato Iannella
• RE: [whatwg] A New Way Forward for HTML5 John Foliot

Thursday, 23 July 2009

• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Norman Walsh
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Dan Brickley
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Peter Mika
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Dan Brickley
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Peter Mika
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Dan Brickley
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Peter Mika
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Renato Iannella

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Manu Sporny
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Manu Sporny
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Cameron McCormack
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Cameron McCormack
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Doug Schepers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto David Singer
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Dan Brickley
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• please review "text/rif+xml" media type registration Sandro Hawke

Monday, 20 July 2009

• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Shelley Powers
• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Sam Ruby
• example of an @font-face applicable license - MyFonts.com, Fertigo Pro Regular Chris Lilley

Sunday, 19 July 2009

• Re: PROPOSAL: Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
• Outstanding Issues in HTML Karl Dubost

Friday, 17 July 2009

• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Brandon Sterne
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Daniel Veditz
• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson
• DOM Events test for scroll event bubbling Simon Pieters
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Daniel Veditz
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Silvia Pfeiffer

Thursday, 16 July 2009

• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson
• Re: Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Bil Corry
• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson
• Comments on the Content Security Policy specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Silvia Pfeiffer

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson
• Trident Keyboard Events Flow with DOM Modifications Jacob Rossi
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson

Monday, 13 July 2009

• RE: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Chris Wilson
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers
• Re: diff: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 to 06 Sean B. Palmer
• Re: diff: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 to 06 Julian Reschke
• diff: draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05 to 06 Sean B. Palmer

Friday, 10 July 2009

• [wbs] response to 'Grant I: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published as Part of a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of fhfrankh8@gmail.com
• Re: Suggestions for HTML5 or further HTML-versions Ian Hickson
• Re: WAI-CG Consensus Recommendations on Alternative Text in HTML 5 Jan Richards
• Re: WAI-CG Consensus Recommendations on Alternative Text in HTML 5 Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 9 July 2009

• Re: Apple objected to theora? Sam Ruby
• Re: Urgent: Fwd: [widgets] Last Call Comments Marcos Caceres
• Re: Apple objected to theora? Lachlan Hunt
• Apple objected to theora? Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Dan Connolly
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers
• Re: WAI-CG Consensus Recommendations on Alternative Text in HTML 5 Jan Richards
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Julian Reschke
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Lachlan Hunt
• Re: WAI-CG Consensus Recommendations on Alternative Text in HTML 5 Henri Sivonen
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Renato Iannella

Wednesday, 8 July 2009

• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett
• RE: PF Response: @Summary John Foliot
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Peter Mika
• minor bug in WebIDL of HTMLMarqueeElement in HTML5 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Janina Sajka
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Sam Ruby
• minor bug in ABNF of 4.3.1.2 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Henri Sivonen
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

• Re: Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Sam Ruby
• Formal Objection to One vendor, One Veto Shelley Powers
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Sam Ruby
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Shelley Powers
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Ian Hickson
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Gez Lemon
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Janina Sajka
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Ian Hickson
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Janina Sajka
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Ian Hickson
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Re: PF Response: @Summary David Poehlman
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Ian Hickson
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Peter Mika
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Harry Halpin
• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• IETF 'pubrules' checker, checks for obseleted or informative/experimental RFCs Chris Lilley
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Janina Sajka
• Urgent: Fwd: Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration questions Arthur Barstow
• Urgent: Fwd: [widgets] Last Call Comments Arthur Barstow
• Re: PF Response: @Summary David Poehlman
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Henri Sivonen
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Steven Faulkner
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Ian Hickson
• RE: PF Response: @Summary Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Steven Faulkner
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Ian Hickson

Monday, 6 July 2009

• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Shelley Powers
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Ian Hickson
• Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF Shelley Powers
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> Rob Sayre
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> David Singer
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> Rob Sayre
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Rob Sayre
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Janina Sajka
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Dan Connolly
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Sam Ruby
• RE: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Justin James
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Shelley Powers
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Lachlan Hunt
• Re: How to make complex data tables more accessible to screen-reader users Shelley Powers
• Re: Problems with MUO units ontology Luis Polo
• Re: PF Response: @Summary David Poehlman
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Joshue O Connor
• Re: PF Response: @Summary Jim Jewett

Saturday, 4 July 2009

• Problems with MUO units ontology Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: ssh key (Was: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda)) Sam Ruby

Friday, 3 July 2009

• Re: vCard RDF merge.... Renato Iannella
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> Rob Sayre
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> Rob Sayre
• Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 2 July 2009

• RE: Nothing is really hidden Justin James
• Re: Nothing is really hidden Doug Schepers
• Re: Nothing is really hidden Shelley Powers
• Re: [Off List] Nothing is really hidden Shelley Powers
• Re: [Off List] Nothing is really hidden Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

• Re: +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Ian Hickson
• Re: +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Toby Inkster
• Re: +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Julian Reschke
• Re: +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Danny Ayers
• +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Steven Faulkner
• Re: +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Giovanni Campagna
• +1 and argumentation style (was Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm)) Danny Ayers
• Re: [png-mng-misc] Errata for PNG spec (tRNS chunk) David Duce
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) Ian Hickson
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) Shelley Powers
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) Shelley Powers
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) Ian Hickson
• Re: Things in HTML that I disagree with (Was: evidence of harm) Ian Hickson

Last message date: Friday, 31 July 2009 11:01:14 UTC