- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:19:50 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Message-ID: <55687cf80907220119p6fc65ff0x32f2f3c2ee90c265@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Manu, would you consider allowing me to edit your version of the spec instead of creating another copy. I would obviously consult with you on what sections i would be working on, to ensure that no conflicts occur. at the current time it I intend to redraft the: 4.8.2 The img element ( http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-img-element) in reference to the WAI consensus document advice ( http://www.w3.org/2009/06/Text-Alternatives-in-HTML5) my inital thoughts are to remove the section 4.8.2.1 Requirements for providing text to act as an alternative for images from the spec and reformulate as a W3C best practice note, referencing it from 4.8.2 The img element along with relevant references from WCAG 2.0. I am also intending to review the 4.9.2 The table element section http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-table-element in relation to summary. I don't know at this point what if/anything will be changed. regards Steve 2009/7/20 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > Sam Ruby wrote: > >> 1. Is the call for more editors collaborating to produce documents > >> genuine or is it a thinly veiled attempt at something else? > > > > If you can find a way to collaborate with Ian (or Manu or Maciej or > > anybody else that has produced a document), that clearly is best. If > > not, producing a document that has a clear division of labor with one or > > more existing documents is the next best alternative (Manu, for example, > > has attempted to do both). > > Laura, John, Steve, > > I would be delighted to work with PFWG and WAI to directly author > language into the HTML5 specification (as both an integrated section and > stand-alone module -- as was done with RDFa[1][2]). The goal would be to > produce a draft document that goes some way towards addressing your > technical concerns. > > I do not see this as a long-term solution to a majority of the process > concerns that each of you have raised, so please note this as an aside > to the conversation currently going on. > > Just offering to help, if I may be of assistance. > > -- manu > > [1]http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/rdfa-module.html > [2]http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/Overview.html#rdfa > > PS: My time to help draft language is limited, as this is not my day job. > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Bitmunk 3.1 Released - Browser-based P2P Commerce > http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/06/29/browser-based-p2p-commerce/ > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 08:20:30 UTC