Re: vCard RDF merge....

I think the vcard2006 ontology should be out quickly and simply define 
the 40 % of the contact detail elements used in 95% of the cases ;-)

Don't let's start a new research project or complex engineering task, 
but let's create a single, consensual recommendation for the basic 
things now

Just my 2 cents.
Martin


Renato Iannella wrote:
>
> Thanks for the discussion everyone....
>
> Firstly, the 2001 Note and 2006 Ontology were focussed on vCard 3.0....
>
> Since vCard 4.0 is close to final...not that many changes to 
> go...should we simply say....leave the NOTE/Ontology as they are and 
> lets do the RDF for vCard 4.0 ?
>
> Comments?
>
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella
> NICTA
>
>

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  mhepp@computer.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================

Webcast:
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/

Recipe for Yahoo SearcMonkey:
http://tr.im/rAbN

Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: 
"Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology"
http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp

Overview article on Semantic Universe:
http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe

Project page:
http://purl.org/goodrelations/

Resources for developers:
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations

Tutorial materials:
CEC'09 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey 
http://tr.im/grcec09