Re: [png-mng-misc] Errata for PNG spec (tRNS chunk)

Thanks Glenn. As you will have seen, I've sent a Defect report to 
ISO/IEC and hopefully that will be processed next week.

Best regards

David

glennrp@comcast.net wrote:
>> has enough process been completed on the W3C side for me
>> to effectively say to Dick that W3C has approved this erratum
>> through its processes and hence we now invite ISO/IEC to do 
>> likewise?
> 
> I've looked back through some old files. This error must have creapt in 
> very early on. Certainly the PNG 1.1 and 1.2 drafts I have use the RGB 
> order.
> 
> 
>     I believe the PNG-1.2 draft establishes our position, so I don't
>     think a formal vote is necessary. Our voting process takes a
>     minimum of 28 days.  I recall that in the past we have used
>     a Call for Unanimous Consent or Call for Objection, which took
>     14 days.  But in this instance I don't think even that is required.
> 
> 
>     Glenn
> 


-- 
Professor David Duce

School of Technology
Oxford Brookes University
Wheatley Campus
OXFORD
OX33 1HX
UK

email: daduce@brookes.ac.uk
tel: +44 (0) 1865 484528
fax: +44 (0) 1865 484545

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 07:47:53 UTC