- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:59:21 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Shelley Powers wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Shelley Powers wrote: >> >> > >> >> > What studies do _you_ plan to take to demonstrate that summary="" >> >> > is the superior solution? >> >> >> >> Actually, I don't believe we need to, not unless there's a plan to do >> >> the same with every last bit of the HTML 5 spec. >> > >> > Ok. So if we shouldn't base decisions on research and data, what >> > _should_ we base our decisions on? >> >> Since this is a discussion based on technical issues related to the HTML >> WG, and began in the HTML WG, I'm not sure why it has been sent to the >> archives mailing list. The switching back and forth can make one dizzy. > > Agreed, I was just following the directions of our chairs. At least I haven't received any requests from the chairs to bring technical discussions, such as the one above, off of the HTML list. Granted, your original email was an extremely long one and so I only read a tiny fraction of it. Could be that other parts of your email was more suited for the www-archives list. But I see no reason that the above discussion couldn't be held on the HTML-WG list. At least as long as everyone is civil. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 06:13:49 UTC