- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:27:35 -0400
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Steven Faulkner wrote: > sam wrote: >>I am particularly puzzled by the stance "we don't make formal replies to > individuals" and "in particular HTML WG editors...are encouraged to make > use of >[WAI XTECH Mailing List and HTML WG Teleconferences]". > > I think you are conflating messages here, the one laura sent and you > quoted from has no official connection or endorsement with any WAI group. > > Your out of context quotation of a reply by Janina to Ian appears to be > on the subject of the protocols for inter working group group > communication on a formal level. Something which i do not understand, > but thought that both you and Janina would being chairs and all. > > best regards > Stevef > > 2009/7/19 Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Laura Carlson wrote: > > To that end, we propose that the HTML working group adopt > the following statement as an official procedure and publish > it in HTML working group Web space. > > Procedure to Promote Progress With Accessibility Issues in HTML5 > > Procedure Overview: > > The HTML WG will look to the W3C WAI groups for guidance, > listen to their advice, and collaborate with them to reach > mutually agreeable accessibility solutions. Furthermore, > collaboration will be promoted in a pro-active manner, i.e., > whenever possible, design features known or foreseen to have > an impact on accessibility will be explored and discussed > with the Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) [2] > prior to decisions in order to ensure mutually beneficial > resolution of issues. > > > Laura, in the interests of the collaboration you espouse, could > you reply to the e-mail I wrote to you last month? > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0669.html > > Collaboration Framework: > > 1. Approach issues on the basis of the shared goal of making > HTML 5 > the best solution for everyone, including people with > disabilities. > > > This should mean working for accessibility as a whole, not > working for specific features. For example, in the context of > tables, it should mean focusing on making tables accessible, not > focusing on the summary="" attribute to the exclusion of > discussion of other solutions. (I have been informed that in > fact the WAI groups are more interested in voting on whether > summary="" is in or out than on voting on what accessibility > solutions should be used to make tables accessible, for instance.) > > Can we get a commitment from members of the WAI to approach > issues on the basis of the shared goal of making HTML 5 the best > solution for everyone, including people with disabilities and > people without disabilities? > > 2. Work from concrete issues as to what in HTML 5 needs to > be improved by asking PFWG to clearly identify accessibility > functional requirements and provide rationale. > > > I most recently tried to approach the WAI on the topic of <canvas>: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2009Jun/0093.html > > I've yet to receive any concrete functional requirements > suggestions for changes to the specification on this topic from > the WAI (although I have received several suggestions from > members of the HTMLWG who are not members of the WAI). I am > still hopeful that the WAI will clearly identify accessibility > functional requirements and provide rationale. Is there any > chance the WAI could provide an ETA for such advice on this topic? > > 3. Listen to their input, ask for clarification, and work > together to > devise solutions to satisfy accessibility requirements. > > > I have asked for clarifications, for example in June, regarding > tables: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0173.html > > I received an official reply to the effect that my questions > were not welcome because they were not from a group: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0260.html > > ...and my reply to that, asking about which groups would qualify > to get a reply, received no replies at all: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0262.html > > 4. Ask PFWG if proposed solutions meet accessibility > requirements. > * If they say no, ask what functionality is still needed and > continue the collaboration. > > > As noted above, I did this with <canvas>, and received no > concrete replies. (I received many thanks, but no technical > replies.) > > I look forward to further collaborations with the WAI, and hope > that concrete advice such as the advice you suggest that we ask > for will be forthcoming. > > > +1 to what Ian said. Continuing where Ian left off: > > Laura Carlson wrote: > > * If they say no, ask what functionality is still needed and > continue the collaboration. > * If they say yes, incorporate text for the mutually agreed upon > solution into the specification. > > > These options are available to every member of the HTML Working > Group. Many members of WAI are members of the HTML Working Group. > Those that are not currently members but are interested in > exercising the above options are also encouraged to join. > > > Collaboration Tools: > > Tools to facilitate the procedure include but are not limited to: > > * WAI XTECH Mailing List [3] > * PF's Caucus on HTML Issues Weekly Teleconference [4] > * Joint Task Forces/Ad Hoc Groups > * Joint Sessions at Face-to-Face Meetings > * HTML WG Teleconferences [5] > * W3C ESW Wiki [6] > * Tracker [7] > > > All of these exist as possibilities and many are actively being used. > > > All interested parties, in particular HTML WG editors, are > encouraged > to make use of these collaboration tools and opportunities. > > > I am particularly puzzled by the stance "we don't make formal > replies to individuals" and "in particular HTML WG editors...are > encouraged to make use of [WAI XTECH Mailing List and HTML WG > Teleconferences]". > > > Respectfully, > > Laura L. Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > Bruce Lawson <bruce@brucelawson.co.uk > <mailto:bruce@brucelawson.co.uk>> > > Opera Software (good standing) > > > Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net > <mailto:ecrire@catherine-roy.net>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > Debi Orton <oradnio@gmail.com <mailto:oradnio@gmail.com>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com <mailto:gez.lemon@gmail.com>> > > > Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net <mailto:jason@jasonjgw.net>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu <mailto:jfoliot@stanford.edu>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no <mailto:lhs@malform.no>> > > (public) Invited expert (good standing) > > > Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com <mailto:rob@robburns.com>> > > > Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com > <mailto:sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>> > > W3C Invited Experts (good standing) > > In a word, I am disappointed by this proposal. In addition to the > two things Ian is waiting on, I am waiting on text for a vote on the > summary issue to be made available for a public review. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#wai > [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/participation.html#Subscribin > [4] http://esw.w3.org/topic/PF/XTech/HTML5/Caucus > [5] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Teleconferences > [6] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML > [7] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker > > A copy of this proposal is also in the ESW Wiki at: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AccessibilityIssueProcedure > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG Europe > Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium > > www.paciellogroup.com <http://www.paciellogroup.com> | www.wat-c.org > <http://www.wat-c.org> > Web Accessibility Toolbar - > http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 14:28:18 UTC