[w3c/webauthn] b073bf: fix spelling and reference
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Call for Exclusions: Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials
wrt client filtering of extensions (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary
Re: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary
RE: Blog post for FPWD announcement
[w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] 16df16: address vijay's comments #3 - minor tweaks
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
FPWD & blog post staged for publication
use cases
Blog post for FWPD announcement
05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary
- RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary
Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
- Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn?
[w3c/webauthn] 6a6014: address Vijay's comments
[w3c/webauthn] ef90dc: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn]
[w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110)
Re: [webauthn] [5 second review] Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD
[w3c/webauthn] bfe17b: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD
Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW
Re: PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions"
regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions"
How to create an IANA registry and populate it from non-IETF specs
if you read mail via gmail, please check..
Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft...
05/25/2006 W3C WebAuthn WG Agenda
PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc.
Re: [webauthn] web-api: is further language needed describing AppID (aka rpId) usage ?
of shortnames and the /TR namespace
Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F)
Notes from WebAuthn Review
[w3c/webauthn] 600b0b: remove Makefile dependency on biblio.json
[w3c/webauthn] f520b5: publishing diff
[w3c/webauthn] 061201: Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/...
Re: [webauthn] Terminology consistency
Cancel call today?
[minutes] 13 May F2F
Fwd: TPAC 2016 Registration Now Open -- Webauthn set to meet Tuesday, Sept. 20
[webauthn] Issue: Remove attestation specification from spec marked as type:technical
[webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec
[webauthn] Issue: Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] Issue: Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] Issue: Add opaque data extension marked as type:technical
[webauthn] Issue: Create an Explainer document marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] Issue: Underspecified error conditions marked as type:technical
Re: [webauthn] AAGUID extension underspecified
Re: [webauthn] The FIDO Metadata Service needs a non-FIDO analogous mechanism
Re: [webauthn] ED512 Support
Closed: [webauthn] ED512 Support
Closed: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID
Re: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID
Closed: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension
Re: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension
Re: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation
Closed: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation
Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system
[webauthn] Issue: WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system marked as duplicate
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity
Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion
Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion
[webauthn] Issue: Document wide review marked as type:process
Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD
Test Plan Development
Draft Webauthn registration figure -- review please
[webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context
[webauthn] Issue: Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context marked as spec:signature-format
[webauthn] Document wide review
[w3c/webauthn] 17efea: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn] 5f6c59: Update README.md
[w3c/webauthn] 09bc41: Update README.md
[w3c/webauthn] 58c350: add link to test repo
[webauthn] Issue: clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al
[webauthn] clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation
[webauthn] Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2)
[webauthn] Issue: Add Android "N" attestation type. marked as type:technical
[webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type.
[webauthn] Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion
[webauthn] Issue: Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion marked as type:technical
[webauthn] New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256.
[webauthn] Issue: New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. marked as type:technical
[webauthn] Issue: Section 4.3: add reference to privacy marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy
[webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used
[webauthn] Issue: Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] Add opaque data extension
[webauthn] Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent
[webauthn] Issue: Privacy across OS accounts marked as stat:Discuss
[webauthn] Privacy across OS accounts
[webauthn] Issue: Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification marked as stat:Discuss
[webauthn] Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification
Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner
Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: clarification of FIDOWebAPI scope
Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: S 2.3 "attestation types" -- move into S 2.1 "attestation models" ?
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Credential Identifier scope
[webauthn] Issue: clarify conveyance of attested public key marked as stat:Discuss
[webauthn] clarify conveyance of attested public key
Web Authentication F2F meeting: Tomorrow, May 13, Berlin
[w3c/webauthn] 8d3761: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn] 0950a1: Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful...
Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features)
- Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features)
- Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features)
- Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features)
[webauthn] Issue: move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al
[webauthn] move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block
[webauthn] Create an Explainer document
[w3c/webauthn] 970210: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn]
[w3c/webauthn] 15e1b9: Lots of FPWD issues (#83)
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Registration (embedded authenticator mode) use cases assumptions
Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Question on FIDO 2.0 layers
Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: lacks explanation of "attestation"
Closed: [webauthn] authenticatorMakeCredential and authenticatorGetAssertion parameters not uniformly specified
Closed: [webauthn] TAG review comments on eTLD+1
Closed: [webauthn] Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique
Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Clarification Credential Type
Closed: [webauthn] Clarify that extensions are optional and may not be supported
Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues
Re: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner
[webauthn] tgbbnccccccevjdnfkufcdnulgkllldgvjrltediuknnjejbj
[webauthn] tgbbn
reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ?
- Re: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ?
- RE: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ?
[webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server
- Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server
- Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server
Diff of vijaybh/lots-of-fpwd-issues branch from master branch
[webauthn] Issue: Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP marked as spec:web-api
[webauthn] Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP
[w3c/webauthn] a8a2d7: JsonWebKey is a dictionary not an interface
Register for next F2F after May 13th Berlin: Sept 20th at TPAC Lisbon
[webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation
[webauthn] assertionChallenge recommendations
[webauthn] Move optional parameters and extensions into an "options" dictionary
Re: Three possibilities for discussion
[w3c/webauthn] c112c9: Clarify security model and remove vestiges of "nat...
[w3c/webauthn] 827a63: Use case: user can use WebAuthn credential when cr...
[w3c/webauthn] b5493f: Make method parameters consistent between API and ...
[w3c/webauthn] c5b321: Clarify attestation model vs. attestation type
updating milestone labels
Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming
Closed: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion
Re: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion
[w3c/webauthn] cd4e78: Simplify attestation structure by moving details i...
[w3c/webauthn] d14fec: Clarify credential type
Closed: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement
Re: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement
[w3c/webauthn] bd6264: Clarify that extensions are optional
Closed: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData?
Re: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData?
Re: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ?
Closed: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ?
[w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b...
[w3c/webauthn] fe40b5: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
Webauthn Tests
[w3c/webauthn] 49d6ba: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones (#82)
[w3c/webauthn] a38ee2: Clarify that RP ID is globally unique
[w3c/webauthn] 66372a: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn]
[w3c/webauthn]
Closed: [webauthn] Abstraction layer for attestations
[w3c/webauthn] cefc6f: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones
5/11 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
[w3c/webauthn] c56539: fix formatting
[w3c/webauthn] 1be2d8: Fix formatting in F2F meeting agenda
[w3c/webauthn] 32994f: Create 2016-05-13-Berlin-f2f.md
[w3c/webauthn] c830a9: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[webauthn] Issue: Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique marked as stat:OKtoDo
Proposed F2F agenda
[w3c/webauthn] 5aa4d7: Incorporate feedback from JeffH, fix an incorrect ...
[w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81)
[w3c/webauthn] 212d61: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81)
Re: [webauthn] Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections
[w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b...
[w3c/webauthn] d1fb5f: Simplify Android attestation by removing manipulat...
[w3c/webauthn] da3117: Rebasing to master after merge of PR#77
[w3c/webauthn] 79afe1: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip]
[w3c/webauthn]
[w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b...
Closed: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Should we be using array types instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings?
Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- RE: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
- Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model
Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings
- Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings
- Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings
[webauthn] adopt consistent terms for RP server-side and client-side components
[w3c/webauthn]
Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin
Simplifying Android attestation
Issues #1 and #61
[webauthn] normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key
[webauthn] Issue: normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key marked as type:editorial
user authn public key duplicated in ScopedCredentialInfo and AttestationStatement (rawData) ?
[webauthn] Issue: biblio.json: TPM refs 404 marked as type:editorial
[webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404
- Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404
- Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404
- Closed: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404