Re: Proposed F2F agenda

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> My goal is to get to zero open FPWD issues by the f2f, and if we can get
> signoff on the attestation change I think we are within shouting distance
> of that goal.
>
>
>
> If we can get there I would like to use the freed-up time to go over what
> people think the big remaining issues are before SPWD (not so much a triage
> as a call to bring out any architectural or design issues, or things
> causing serious implementation concerns).
>
>
Sure.  I was envisioning that we could slide things forward or backward as
time was needed or not.  I think we will still have some procedural issues
to discuss for FPWD in any case (though I defer to Wendy on specifics).

--Richard


>
>
> *From:* Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@mozilla.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:10 AM
> *To:* W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Proposed F2F agenda
>
>
>
> Proposed agenda for our F2F next week is below.  Feel free to raise any
> comments here, or on the call today.
>
> --Richard
>
>
> WebAuthentication F2F
> 13 May 2016, Berlin, DE
>
> 09:00-10:30
> - Welcome
> - Intros
> - Review of status
> - Review of open FPWD issues
> 10:30-11:00 Break
> 11:00-12:00
> - Discussion of remaining FPWD issues (goal: get all editor-ready)
> 12:00-13:00 Break
> 13:00-14:30
> - Finalize FPWD timeline (incl. review / dependencies)
> - Triage of SPWD issues
> 14:30-15:00 Break
> 15:00-17:00
> - SPWD issue discussion
> - Discussion of TPAC F2F
> - Wrap-up
>