public-webauthn@w3.org from May 2016 by author

=JeffH

• Re: Simplifying Android attestation (Tuesday, 3 May)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Tuesday, 31 May)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 31 May)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Friday, 27 May)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Add opaque data extension (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: [webauthn] web-api: is further language needed describing AppID (aka rpId) usage ? (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Terminology consistency (Saturday, 21 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used (Saturday, 21 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) (Saturday, 21 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy (Saturday, 21 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) marked as type:editorial (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent marked as type:editorial (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Add opaque data extension marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Create an Explainer document marked as type:editorial (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Underspecified error conditions marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] clarify returned values from authenticatorMakeCredential operation (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: clarify conveyance of attested public key marked as stat:Discuss (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] clarify conveyance of attested public key (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block marked as spec:web-api-sig-fmt-et-al (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] move biblio.js into in-line <pre class=biblio> block (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [webauthn] adopt consistent terms for RP server-side and client-side components (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [webauthn] normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key marked as type:editorial (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: biblio.json: TPM refs 404 marked as type:editorial (Monday, 2 May)
• [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 (Monday, 2 May)

Adam Powers

• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Monday, 23 May)
• RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review (Sunday, 22 May)
• Notes from WebAuthn Review (Saturday, 21 May)
• Re: Test Plan Development (Friday, 13 May)
• Test Plan Development (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Webauthn Tests (Friday, 6 May)
• Webauthn Tests (Friday, 6 May)

Adam Powers via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] tgbbn (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] tgbbnccccccevjdnfkufcdnulgkllldgvjrltediuknnjejbj (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [webauthn] tgbbnccccccevjdnfkufcdnulgkllldgvjrltediuknnjejbj (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [webauthn] tgbbn (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation (Sunday, 8 May)
• [webauthn] assertionChallenge recommendations (Sunday, 8 May)

Alexei Czeskis

• Re: Three possibilities for discussion (Sunday, 8 May)
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: Simplifying Android attestation (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: Simplifying Android attestation (Tuesday, 3 May)

Alexei Czeskis via GitHub

• [webauthn] Issue: Remove attestation specification from spec marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Remove attestation specification from spec (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context marked as spec:signature-format (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)

Anthony Nadalin

• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Thursday, 26 May)
• 05/25/2006 W3C WebAuthn WG Agenda (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Tuesday, 24 May)
• RE: Cancel call today? (Wednesday, 18 May)
• 5/11 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Thursday, 5 May)
• Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin (Tuesday, 3 May)

bifurcation via GitHub

• [webauthn] Issue: Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique marked as stat:OKtoDo (Wednesday, 4 May)

Dirk Balfanz

• use cases (Friday, 27 May)

GitHub

• [w3c/webauthn] b073bf: fix spelling and reference (Tuesday, 31 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110) (Friday, 27 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 16df16: address vijay's comments #3 - minor tweaks (Friday, 27 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 6a6014: address Vijay's comments (Thursday, 26 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] ef90dc: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Thursday, 26 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 26 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 46784e: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (#110) (Thursday, 26 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] bfe17b: Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (Wednesday, 25 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 600b0b: remove Makefile dependency on biblio.json (Saturday, 21 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] f520b5: publishing diff (Saturday, 21 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 061201: Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/... (Saturday, 21 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 17efea: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Friday, 13 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 5f6c59: Update README.md (Friday, 13 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 09bc41: Update README.md (Friday, 13 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 58c350: add link to test repo (Friday, 13 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 8d3761: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Thursday, 12 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0950a1: Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful... (Thursday, 12 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 970210: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Wednesday, 11 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 11 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 15e1b9: Lots of FPWD issues (#83) (Wednesday, 11 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] a8a2d7: JsonWebKey is a dictionary not an interface (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] c112c9: Clarify security model and remove vestiges of "nat... (Saturday, 7 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 827a63: Use case: user can use WebAuthn credential when cr... (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] b5493f: Make method parameters consistent between API and ... (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] c5b321: Clarify attestation model vs. attestation type (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] cd4e78: Simplify attestation structure by moving details i... (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] d14fec: Clarify credential type (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] bd6264: Clarify that extensions are optional (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] fe40b5: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 49d6ba: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones (#82) (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] a38ee2: Clarify that RP ID is globally unique (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 66372a: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 6 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] cefc6f: Replace TPM hyperlinks with working ones (Thursday, 5 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] c56539: fix formatting (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1be2d8: Fix formatting in F2F meeting agenda (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 32994f: Create 2016-05-13-Berlin-f2f.md (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] c830a9: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 5aa4d7: Incorporate feedback from JeffH, fix an incorrect ... (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81) (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 212d61: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 53d985: Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (#81) (Wednesday, 4 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] d1fb5f: Simplify Android attestation by removing manipulat... (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] da3117: Rebasing to master after merge of PR#77 (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 79afe1: Script updating gh-pages. [ci skip] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 3 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4fbfa4: Clarify Android attestation procedure (Sunday, 1 May)
• [w3c/webauthn] 19f23b: Remove base64 from packed and TPM attestation form... (Sunday, 1 May)

gmandyam via GitHub

• [webauthn] Clarify which sign. algm.'s RP's must support (Sec. 4.3.2.1.2) (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Add opaque data extension (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Clarify when an extension may be ignored by user agent (Friday, 13 May)

Harry Halpin

• Register for next F2F after May 13th Berlin: Sept 20th at TPAC Lisbon (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: Webauthn Tests (Friday, 6 May)

Hodges, Jeff

• wrt client filtering of extensions (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Saturday, 28 May)
• Re: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW (Wednesday, 25 May)
• regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace (Monday, 23 May)
• of shortnames and the /TR namespace (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: Notes from WebAuthn Review (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: Cancel call today? (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)

J.C. Jones

• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? (Thursday, 12 May)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Create an Explainer document (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Update reference to Secure-Contexts (from Powerful-Features) (Thursday, 12 May)

James 'J.C.' Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Thursday, 5 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings (Tuesday, 3 May)

jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com

• Re: if you read mail via gmail, please check.. (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Wednesday, 25 May)
• regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" (Wednesday, 25 May)
• How to create an IANA registry and populate it from non-IETF specs (Wednesday, 25 May)
• if you read mail via gmail, please check.. (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... (Tuesday, 24 May)
• PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD (Saturday, 14 May)
• Draft Webauthn registration figure -- review please (Friday, 13 May)
• RE: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? (Thursday, 12 May)
• reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Diff of vijaybh/lots-of-fpwd-issues branch from master branch (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: updating milestone labels (Saturday, 7 May)
• updating milestone labels (Friday, 6 May)
• user authn public key duplicated in ScopedCredentialInfo and AttestationStatement (rawData) ? (Monday, 2 May)

Johan Verrept via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Spec should not mandate behavior of server (Friday, 13 May)

John Fontana

• Re: Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... (Tuesday, 24 May)

levangongPayPal via GitHub

• [webauthn] Issue: Privacy across OS accounts marked as stat:Discuss (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] Privacy across OS accounts (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification marked as stat:Discuss (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] Authenticator Selection Extension - Client Processing - Clarification (Thursday, 12 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP marked as spec:web-api (Tuesday, 10 May)
• [webauthn] Scoped credentials represent a relationship between user and RP (Tuesday, 10 May)

Mandyam, Giridhar

• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RE: Cancel call today? (Wednesday, 18 May)

Michael[tm] Smith via GitHub

• [webauthn] Create an Explainer document (Thursday, 12 May)

Mike Jones

• RE: Blog post for FPWD announcement (Friday, 27 May)
• Blog post for FWPD announcement (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Monday, 23 May)
• RE: of shortnames and the /TR namespace (Monday, 23 May)
• RE: [w3c/webauthn] 634c26: Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of b... (Wednesday, 4 May)

Richard Barnes

• Re: regarding "opaque pass-thru extensions" (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD (Monday, 23 May)
• Re: Cancel call today? (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Cancel call today? (Wednesday, 18 May)
• Re: Test Plan Development (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Test Plan Development (Friday, 13 May)
• Call for Consensus: Publish FPWD (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: Webauthn Tests (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: Proposed F2F agenda (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Proposed F2F agenda (Wednesday, 4 May)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Security: Signature format doesn't cover whole context (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Add Android "N" attestation type. marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Add Android "N" attestation type. (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Add section describing verification of a WebAuthnAssertion marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. marked as type:technical (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Section 4.3: add reference to privacy marked as type:editorial (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Section 4.3: add reference to privacy (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: Section 4: Mention requirement for user to give consent for key to be used marked as type:editorial (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Friday, 6 May)

Sampath Srinivas

• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: Thanks very much to Tony and Microsoft... (Tuesday, 24 May)

Samuel Weiler

• FPWD & blog post staged for publication (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: How to create an IANA registry and populate it from non-IETF specs (Wednesday, 25 May)

Vijay Bharadwaj

• RE: extensions, continued.. (was: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• RE: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: Draft blog post for FWPD announcement - PLEASE REVIEW (Thursday, 26 May)
• RE: PR#109: Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Wednesday, 25 May)
• RE: Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Extensions (was RE: [minutes] 13 May F2F) (Saturday, 21 May)
• RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review (Saturday, 21 May)
• RE: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? (Wednesday, 11 May)
• RE: Three possibilities for discussion (Sunday, 8 May)
• RE: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming (Saturday, 7 May)
• RE: Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming (Friday, 6 May)
• Lots of editorial fixes and issues coming (Friday, 6 May)
• RE: Proposed F2F agenda (Wednesday, 4 May)
• RE: Simplifying Android attestation (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Simplifying Android attestation (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: Issues #1 and #61 (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Issues #1 and #61 (Tuesday, 3 May)

Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Editorial polishing of abstract, intro material, terminology, etc. (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: [webauthn] [5 second review] Fix spec shortname to prep for FPWD (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: [webauthn] AAGUID extension underspecified (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] The FIDO Metadata Service needs a non-FIDO analogous mechanism (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] ED512 Support (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] ED512 Support (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Structure of Credential ID (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Define AuthenticatorVersion extension (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Key-Attestation: no point compression in the Packed attestation (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Issue: WebAPI: need to propagate credential de-commissioning through the system marked as duplicate (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: Authentication failure due to inactivity (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion (Friday, 13 May)
• Re: [webauthn] WebAPI: add userID as input parameter in authenticatorGetAssertion (Friday, 13 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Clarification of assertion delivery in platform specific manner (Thursday, 12 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: clarification of FIDOWebAPI scope (Thursday, 12 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: S 2.3 "attestation types" -- move into S 2.1 "attestation models" ? (Thursday, 12 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Credential Identifier scope (Thursday, 12 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Registration (embedded authenticator mode) use cases assumptions (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] key-attestation: lacks explanation of "attestation" (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] authenticatorMakeCredential and authenticatorGetAssertion parameters not uniformly specified (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] TAG review comments on eTLD+1 (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Credential.id currently assumed to be RP unique (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] WebAPI: Clarification Credential Type (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] SigFormat: Question on FIDO 2.0 layers (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify that extensions are optional and may not be supported (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Lots of FPWD issues (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: [webauthn] ScopedCredentialInfo attestation (Sunday, 8 May)
• [webauthn] Move optional parameters and extensions into an "options" dictionary (Sunday, 8 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename WebAuthnAssertion / getAssertion (Friday, 6 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Verification of publicKey missing in section 3.5 Verifying an Attestation Statement (Friday, 6 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ? (Friday, 6 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] encodedClientData should be clientDataJSON ? (Friday, 6 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] biblio.json: TPM refs 404 (Friday, 6 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] Abstraction layer for attestations (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Simplify attestation structure by moving details into authnr model (Friday, 6 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Pre-FWPD proofreading corrections (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Closed: [webauthn] TAG review feedback: Should we be using array types instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings? (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] Represent binary data as ArrayBuffers instead of base64-encoded DOMStrings (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: [webauthn] normalizing term(s) for authenticator-generated RP-specific public key (Tuesday, 3 May)

Wendy Seltzer

• Re: 05/24/2016 WebAuthn Summary (Friday, 27 May)
• Re: github notifications setup for w3c/webauthn? (Thursday, 26 May)
• [minutes] Re: 05/25/2006 W3C WebAuthn WG Agenda (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: of shortnames and the /TR namespace (Monday, 23 May)
• [minutes] 13 May F2F (Saturday, 14 May)
• Re: Webauthn Tests (Friday, 13 May)
• Web Authentication F2F meeting: Tomorrow, May 13, Berlin (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: reference for SECURE-CONTEXTS (nee POWERFUL-FEATURES) ? (Tuesday, 10 May)
• Re: updating milestone labels (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: updating milestone labels (Saturday, 7 May)
• Re: Proposed F2F agenda (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin (Wednesday, 4 May)
• Re: Web Authentication Face to Face meeting in Berlin (Tuesday, 3 May)

Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

• [webauthn] Issue: Document wide review marked as type:process (Friday, 13 May)
• [webauthn] Document wide review (Friday, 13 May)

Wendy Seltzer W3C

• Fwd: TPAC 2016 Registration Now Open -- Webauthn set to meet Tuesday, Sept. 20 (Friday, 13 May)

Xueyuan Jia

• Call for Exclusions: Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials (Tuesday, 31 May)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2016 22:24:19 UTC