W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > May 2016

RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review

From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 21:20:12 +0000
To: Adam Powers <adam@fidoalliance.org>, W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0f216f02a311487c8c430454f86987fd@microsoft.com>
I’m not sure that it’s efficient to file new issues for each comment, and a lot of these are things where I think the right fix would be somewhere other than the place you get confused – essentially the text should have led in better to the statement that actually tripped you up.

How about we do this in a more iterative way? I can create a branch next week and maybe we can do some back-and-forth editing to see if we can refine the text. WDYT?

From: Adam Powers [mailto:adam@fidoalliance.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 8:42 AM
To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Subject: Notes from WebAuthn Review

Hi all,

During the face to face in Berlin I had raised my hand to read through the review draft of the spec and provide comments. I tried to approach this as if I were a first-time reader and think about what things might trip up an implementer.

Attached are my annotations in PDF — sorry for the weird format, but I did my reading / reviewing in Evernote while sitting on a plane.

Let me know if I should drop these into a GitHub issue or if there’s some better way to provide feedback.


Received on Saturday, 21 May 2016 21:21:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:20 UTC